Spirituality, Sustainability, and A Global Consciousness



by Rabbi Warren Stone

One of my late teachers, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, once said: “The modern person behaves as if the sole purpose of the universe were to satisfy their needs.” His challenge: “We must not give in to that reality, but rather transcend it by sacrificing one’s own interests for the sake of the holy.”

Heschel pointed to a fundamental truth about economics. Underlying all economics are basic core principles and values. To the extent that ever-increasing consumption is our primary value, that strategy is doomed to failure. Our world economies and world resources cannot sustain endless growth and consumption without destroying life as we know it on this Earth. The world’s population,which was 6 billion in 1960, has grown to an astonishing 9 billion just 50 years later. The upward spiral continues.  We lead the Western World in using up more resources than we can sustain, while the developing worlds of China and India and other parts of Asia are rapidly growing both in population and new consumption. I recently spoke at a world conference of religious leaders in Seoul, South Korea. This was a different Seoul than the one I visited in 1997, when by all appearances; South Korea was a developing country. Today, Seoul has become a state-of-the-art bustling city of great of wealth. I counted three Apple stores on a main street.

I went to Seoul to participate in a World Forum called the G20 World Religious Leaders Forum, sponsored by the Global Peace Initiative of Women. Our conference was concurrent with the G20 Economic Summit of leaders from the 20 leading developed nations. Twenty religious leaders, representing the world’s religions from around the world, gave talks at Buddhist Temples and forums for four days on issues of economics, sustainability and spirituality. Particularly, we spoke about the need for a sustainable world economy, rather than an approach to the economy based on growing consumerism.

One day, our session ended at 2pm, and we had to take a bus to lunch. The driver became lost and our host said; “You must be very hungry. Now we won’t eat lunch until 4pm, but I have plenty of cookies.” She offered the bus a carton of cookies. Later, a Buddhist Monk fashioned a parable from our cookie experience. As he put it: “We were very hungry, and I needed one cookie since I was getting faint. I wanted two since I was still hungry and I even desired having three or more. But one cookie was all I needed to satisfy my hunger. I wanted two cookies, and there was enough so that I could satisfy that want. But the third cookie was more than my need and more than my want. It was a desire, which represented luxury and overabundance. I chose not to take more than two.”

So it is with the world. Everyone needs enough so they won’t be hungry. Many want more, and for many, more is available. Beyond that, there is the desire for luxury, where we desire more anymore of things we do not really need. We were hungry because we missed lunch, but many of our brothers and sisters in our world are hungry always.  We need to remind ourselves that we are connected to the global family and rethink our own attitudes toward economics and consumption.  We, too, need to think about sustainability in our own lives. What do we use up? What can we conserve?

If we look around, we see staggering statistics. In 1980, 800 million people live din poverty and daily hunger, today that number is well over one billion. Failed states from Haiti to the sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia account for much of this need. Many who suffer from hunger also live in areas of the world where water is scarce, food prices are rising and malnutrition and disease are rampant. A wise Jewish sage,Maimonides once wrote, “If a brother (or sister) does not have compassion upon a brother (sister), who will have compassion upon him?(her)” (Mishna Torah) We are a global family and our family is suffering. It is time for us to act with boldness and moral courage to alleviate this suffering. It is past time for the developing and developed world to think seriously about economic sustainability and,as a primary priority, to deal with this growing hunger and world poverty.

Where does change begin? Heschel points to holiness in daily life, which can lead one to a life of inner meaning, a sense of justice and the bringing of a deep sense of equity to the world. Another great spiritual teacher: Mahatma Gandhi said it quite clearly:”We must become the change we want to see in the world.”

Rabbi Warren Stone has served as rabbi of Temple Emanuel in Kensington, MD, since 1988. He serves as co-chair of the National Religion Coalition on Creation Care and is the founding chair of the Central Conference of American Rabbis’ Committee on the Environment. This post originally appeared on his climaterabbi blog.

Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook Email
Uncategorized
Guest Blogger

About Guest Blogger

RJ.org accepts submissions for consideration. Send your posts to rjblog@urj.org. Please include biographical information, including your affiliation with any Reform congregation or institution.

One Response to “Spirituality, Sustainability, and A Global Consciousness”

  1. avatar

    Rabbi –
    I read your essay with great interest. It was very thought provoking and raises many questions to which I would be interested in your responses:
    “Underlying all economics are basic core principles and values”
    *Is the continued economic failure of “states from Haiti to the sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia” related to their basic core principles and values?
    *The lack of development and long-term failure of states appears correlated to the lack of freedom. Is it a greater good to advocate for this freedom as a permanent solution for these otherwise intractable problems?
    *Given the amount of aid given to these failed states, seemingly without long-term effect, does it make sense to make further aid requisite on fixing these underlying cultural issues?
    “Our world economies and world resources can not sustain endless growth and consumption without destroying life as we know it on this Earth…the world population has grown to an astonishing 9 billion”
    *What is the sustainable world population?
    *How is this number determined?
    *If the number is less the current 9 billion, what should we do with the excess population?
    *Who should decide this?
    In the entire history of mankind, no system has proven better than capitalism in lifting the great masses out of poverty. You seem to be proposing a massive redistribution of wealth to the developing and 3rd world.
    *Can you name a single instance where such a redistributive model resulted in a long-term improvement in the lives of the recipients of others wealth?
    Currently, the vast majority of the developed world is experiencing net loss of native population (Japan and Europe). The majority of America’s slow population growth is via immigration. It seems that the long-term benefits of wealth capitalism generates include a cleaner environment, improved health and declining population growth.
    *Do you advocate capitalism and wealth accumulation for the less developed world as a long-term solution to population growth?
    *If not, why not?
    One result of this declining population in the developed West is the creation of a heretofore unheard of inverted population demographic with 4 grandparents, 2 parents and one child. This situation makes the current social welfare state unsustainable.
    *Should the net consumers of the social welfare state largesse take less from their children to maintain the sustainability of the social welfare state?

Leave a Reply

*