Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

« July 2007 | Main | September 2007 »

August 26, 2007

Limbaugh on Darfur: It's All Politics

It’s not easy for Rush Limbaugh to say something so outrageous that it rises above his run of the mill outrageousness.  But he did so last week.  Rush (I hope he does not mind my being so informal) believes that the Democrats are only interested in the situation in Darfur because it allows them to appeal to Black voters at home. The indispensable “Media Matters” website has the full text of Rush’s exchange with a listener making this remarkable argument.  If you can’t believe what you are reading, they also have the audio for your listening pleasure.  (Both are available here.) 

What exactly did he say?  In response to a caller, Limbaugh claimed that Democrats "want to get us out of Iraq, but they can't wait to get us into Darfur." He continued: "There are two reasons. What color is the skin of the people in Darfur? It's black. And who do the Democrats really need to keep voting for them? If they lose a significant percentage of this voting bloc, they're in trouble." The caller responded, "The black population," to which Limbaugh said, "Right."

This raises so many questions.  Does Limbaugh think, for example, that the many Republicans who have called for forceful action in Darfur are also only doing so to compete for Black votes?   Does he think it is simply impossible that some politicians – Democratic and Republican alike – could look at the tragic situation in Darfur and feel that their own personal morality requires responding?  Is Limbaugh’s cynicism so great that he cannot believe that people would seek to end genocide for other than nakedly political reasons?

Feel free to leave your own question below.

August 22, 2007

Reform Judaism is Religious Judaism

This past Monday Jacques Berlinerblau posted an entry on Newsweek’s blog On Faith entitled “Michael Bloomberg and his God Problem”.  I, as well as numerous other individuals in the Reform Movement, found this post to be deeply troubling because of the flippant tone in which it characterized Reform Judaism.  Below is a replication of the comments which I made in response to Berlinerblau’s entry on Newsweek’s website: In a recent posting on Newsweek’s blog On Faith, Jacques Berlinerblau speaks of Reform Judaism and Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s association with it in a dismissive tone, classifying Reform Judaism as a “secularized religion”.  As a deeply committed Reform Jew myself, I find this statement, and in fact his posting as a whole which attacks Bloomberg’s religions preferences as a Reform Jew, to be deeply offensive. What exactly is Berlinerblau insinuating by classifying Reform Judaism as a “secularized religion”?  Granted, Berlinerblau offers no definitive meaning, but to me I interpret such a statement to mean that he considers Reform Judaism a non-religion.  If this is what he is claiming, then there are over 1.5 million Reform Jews in America that I believe would argue to the contrary.  Reform Judaism is in fact the largest and fastest growing segment of the Jewish population in America and consists of deeply committed Jews.  It is a vibrant community that Berlinerblau is right to claim emphasizes gimiulut chasadim or the pursuit of social justice; however he fails to mention that we are equally committed to torah and avodah – lifelong Jewish learning and the worship of God.  Such an omission is a failure to understand Reform Judaism at its most basic level – as a religion.  A religion that has 3 seminaries, over 900 congregations, over 1800 Rabbis, and countless Cantors and Jewish Educators.  To claim that this is a community of atheists is to insult all of these institutions and to insult Reform Jews as a whole. I would urge Berlinerblau to learn more about Reform Judaism and the practices of Reform Jews prior to offering a degrading evaluation of it, and its institutions, as a non-religion.

August 21, 2007

You Shall Be Holy

“It is that command to be holy that calls us to a partnership with the Divine to make God’s vision of justice and peace real here on Earth, to create a better and more hopeful future for all God’s children. You shall be Holy for the Eternal your God is Holy.”

There is to me no more exalted formulation of the human condition and our role in the universe than these words of Lev.19:2 and the evocative rules exemplifying the implementation of that idea described in the ensuing verses.

We are reminded that we are created in the image of God, capable of being holy through the way we live our lives, just as the Eternal is holy. Infusing a sense of God’s presence into every aspect of our lives remains at the core of our religious values and identity."

So the verses go on to exemplify that holiness resides in every aspect of life: in religious observance, in the way we treat our family, in the way we treat our neighbor, in the way we do our work, in our sexual relations. Everything is capable of manifesting holiness.

Above all, in the powerful call of those verses that remind us that to seek to be holy, as God is holy, we are required to feed the hungry and remove the stumbling block before the blind, create courts of justice and marketplaces that are fair and honest, to pay the laborer a fair and timely wage, we hear the Bible’s revolutionary call to ethical monotheism, a vision that has transformed the history of humankind. It is exactly that call that has ennobled humanity, -- as Prof. Isadore Twersky once wrote, raising us above mere biological existence and giving to our lives meaning, destiny and purpose. It is that command to be holy that calls us to a partnership with the Divine to make God’s vision of justice and peace real here on Earth, to create a better and more hopeful future for all God’s children. And that is a code -- this so-called Holiness Code -- which can and must bring together all the Abrahamic faiths in common vision and purpose.

Cross Posted on OnFaith

August 20, 2007

Carolyn Goodman Z’L

Doug Mishkin is a Partner at, and co-chair of the Emplyment Law Practice Group of, the Washington-based Law firm of Patton Boggs LLP.  He is also a noted singer/songwriter, and a long-time friend of the Religious Action Center.

Carolyn Goodman, a remarkable civil rights advocate, passed away Friday at age 91.  The New York Times ran a terrific obituary (available here) on Saturday.  The Religious Action Center was honored to recognize Dr. Goodman’s work – so much of which was inspired by the murder of her son, Andrew and two other civil rights workers in 1964 – at our annual Martin Luther King Civil Rights Leadership Awards last year.  I presented the award to Dr. Goodman, and my remarks follow:

 

Presentation of the Religious Action Center’s
Martin Luther King Civil Rights Leadership Award to Caroylyn Goodman. 
Embassy of Israel.
Janauary 12, 2006

I met Carolyn Goodman in 1989 at the Carter Center in Atlanta at a reunion of blacks and Jews who had worked together in the civil rights movement.  I was sitting at a dinner table, doing my anti-social best to mind my own business, when a woman on the other side of the table asked: “What brings you here?” I said “David Saperstein has asked me to sing a few songs.”  I knew the polite thing to do was to ask: “And how do you come to be here?”  She said:  “My son was killed in Mississippi 25 years ago.”  I looked at her name tag, saw the name Goodman.  In an instant, I was 10 years old again, seeing the TVnews footage of the search for and eventual finding of Goodman, Schwerner and Chaney.  Then I thought to myself, what an interesting footnote to history, to meet the mother of one of the three civil rights workers, as they would always be known.

Well, footnote, nothing.    Ten minutes later, I understood how 20-year-old Andy Goodman could have had the courage, the commitment, the temerity to sign up for Freedom Summer in Mississippi in 1964.  Ten minutes later, I realized I was talking to a woman who had taught her son the values of justice the only way those values can be taught – by living them.  I couldn’t stop listening to her and I couldn’t stop looking at her.  Ten minutes later I was in love.

Dr. Carolyn Goodman is a clinical psychologist by trade.  As a psychologist, she broke new ground years ago by establishing a clinical program at the Bronx Psychiatric Center for low income, minority families, a program known as PACE – Parent and Child Education.  She is a fellow of the American Psychological Association.

Her distinguished professional accomplishments are but one piece of an extraordinary life.  Through the doors of her home in that magical planet-within New York City known as the Upper West Side passed the actors, the writers, the musicians, the intellectuals and especially the blacklisted.  In the Goodman household, civil rights was the dinnertime discussion, it was an article of faith, it was the vision of noted family friends like the novelist Howard Fast and the actor Zero Mostel.  Civil rights came with the Goodman territory, and thus, as Carolyn has said many times, there was no way to stop Andy Goodman when he announced he was going to Mississippi the summer of 1964.

But we honor Carolyn Goodman today not because of any focus on the past, but because she has always stayed focused on fighting for the future of our country.  In the time I’ve known her – remember, she was just a kid of 74 when I met her in 1989 – she’s been dedicated to promoting youth activism.  Not by talking about it.  By actively engaging young people.  In 1989, she brought together the Chaney, Schwerner and Goodman families to honor the memory of the three boys and of all those who worked, and died, in the cause of civil rights.  She organized the Freedom Caravan, which went from Philadelphia, Mississippi to NYC.  In 1994, she organized Freedom Summer 1994, dedicated to training of youth organizers.  That led to the creation of a film documentary, Hidden Heroes, that takes head-on the cynical stereotype of uninterested youths and demolishes it with its portraits of real young people who are active inheritors of Dr. King’s legacy.

Her latest project is another film documentary entitled Neshoba.  The project began in April 2004 with the purpose of ensuring that the 40th anniversary of the killings of Goodman, Schwerner & Chaney would not pass unnoticed.  In the middle of producing the film, in no small part because of Carolyn’s efforts, a task force succeeded in persuading Mississippi officials to prosecute Edgar Ray Killen, the Klan leader who coordinated the killings and who had never gone to jail – a prosecution that has put Killen in jail. 

Carolyn is a legend.  Not in the sense of being a celebrity whose name and face are known to all.  In a more meaningful sense.  She is a legend to those who know her, to those who hear her, to those who are privileged to work with her, to those who’ve been touched by her – to thousands upon thousands of people.    We are awe-struck – by your energy, because your day starts before and ends after ours does; by your commitment, because you never flinch from your vision of justice; and truthfully, most of all,  by your unfailing warmth, optimism and love even in the face of cruel personal loss.

But I swear to you my friend that those of us who never actually knew your son Andy feel him inside us.  We feel him because you have put him there through your work for social justice.  We feel your love of him in your love of our country.  And this country feels him, too.  It feels him when African Americans vote and hold elective office, all over the country and in Mississippi.  And it feels him when we celebrate the fact that our country now honors with a national holiday the man who inspired him, who inspired you, who inspired us all.

I have to think Dr. King himself would be honored to count you among those formally recognized as a part of his legacy.  You are, indeed, a sweet survivor.  Ladies and gentlemen, I’m proud to introduce Dr. Carolyn Goodman.

Update: Our friend Jeremy Burton has posted a powerful tribute to Dr. Goodman on J-Spot today.

 

August 13, 2007

Censoring Eddie Veder

As readers of RACBlog are certainly well aware, in early August, Pearl Jam headlined Lollapalooza (again…). While I won’t speak to the “net-neutrality” issues the band would like me to; the controversy regarding censorship of the AT&T webcast of their performance highlights basic freedom of speech questions.  In doing a cover of Pink Floyd’s “The Wall,” the band improvised: “George Bush leave this world alone. George Bush find yourself another home.”

AT&T says it was an accident and done by a third party; but whoever censored Eddie Veder was certainly not comfortable with his words.  Now further allegations are coming out about how AT&T “ensures quality” in it’s blue room series.

Voters Care About Poverty. Are Candidates Listening?

Very interesting, and encouraging, news from New Hampshire today, as the One Campaign prepares to release some new polling data demonstrating that voters care, and care deeply, about poverty issues.  A “curtain raiser” on the report is available here. 

Among the findings of the new poll by two prominent firms (Peter D. Hart Research Associates and McLaughlin and Associates) are that:
  • Both Democrats (81%) and Republicans alike (70%) agree that reducing poverty, treating preventable diseases and improving education in poor countries around the world will help make the world safer and the United States more secure
  • Democrats (90%) and Republicans (85%) agree that it is in keeping with the country’s values and our history of compassion to lead an effort to solve some of the most serious problems facing the world’s poorest people.
  • Democrats (86%) and Republicans (67%) agree that it is important for Presidential candidates to discuss their plans for addressing global hunger and poverty issues in this campaign
  • Eight in ten Democrats (81%) and Republicans (80%) agree that the next president should keep the commitments made by President Bush to prevent and fight the spread of AIDS in Africa.

The full report will be posted here this afternoon.

August 10, 2007

Schism in the Evangelical Community?

In a recent article in the New York Jewish week entitled “Evangelical Split Over Israel Batters Bush”, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, President of the Union for Reform Judaism, responds to new developments indicating a split within the Evangelical community’s approach towards Israel. 

Until recently one, myself included, could have convincingly argued that the American Evangelical community spoke in one unified voice on Israel issues, with no variation, of staunch unconditional support for Israel advocating a position to the political right of many in our community.  However, this past week the Evangelical community publicly broke ranks and divided into two separate Israel camps, each lobbying President Bush in public letters this week: one camp being led by Rev John Hagee and his organization Christians United for Israel and one camp being led by Rev Ronald Sider, President of Evangelicals for Social Action, and 34 more politically liberal Evangelical leaders.  Rev Hagee, whose support for Israel has always been received cautiously by the Reform Movement, is now vocally lobbying President Bush to support a one-state rather than a two-state solution – a stance in opposition to that of the Reform Movement and calls for a change in both American and Israeli stated policy.  Rev Ronald Sider’s letter took a strikingly different tone advocating for a two-state solution, a position embraced by the Reform Movement.  Although Sider’s letter also contained references that are problematic for the Reform Movement, it was encouraging to hear another voice on Israel emerging from the American Evangelical Community. 

 

As a progressive Jew I long ago realized that I can support a two-state solution and remain a Zionist.  One can only hope that this is a reality which our friends in the American Evangelical community will also learn to identify with.

August 8, 2007

Can rock save the world?

The new issue of Paste Magazine (what? You don’t read Paste Magazine?) has a great cover package on rock music, rock musicians, and social change.

 The editorial introducing the section notes that:

Throughout its history, rock ’n’ roll has been derided as morally bankrupt, blamed for everything from the proliferation of drugs to the Columbine shootings. When it comes to social justice, though, rock has often led the way—it was on the vanguard of the peace and civil-rights movements, it raised money and awareness for the famine in Ethiopia, it helped American family farmers, and, to this day, its practitioners often look after one another when tragedy strikes the music community.

The section includes stories about the Live Earth concerts earlier this summer, Bono’s work in Africa, Peter Gabriel’s involvement with human rights, and powerful work being done by Jars of Clay, Jay-Z, Emmylou Harris, Steve Earle, and a dozen others.  In addition to global warming and Africa-related issues, the artists are making important contributions on issues ranging from health care to modern-day slavery to land-mines and the death penalty.

What is most exciting to me about this work is how it goes beyond the more typical charity/fundraising dynamic, and moves into real advocacy for social change.  

As the artists themselves realize, it’s easy to make fun of their involvement, to chalk their efforts up to dilettantism.  But there is something more, much more, than that going on.  The editors ask:

Can rock save the world? Probably not. Can rock change the world? Unequivocally, yes. For better and worse, it always has been a powerful force for change, and we celebrate those working to improve the human condition. Cynicism be damned.

August 7, 2007

Engaging Rogue States

Former State Department Official Dennis Ross has a characteristically insightful piece on the New Repulic website this week.

Taking off from the Obama/Clinton disagreement about meeting with the leaders of "rogue states," Ross argues that such meeting -- or the decision not to hold a meeting -- can only be effective as part of strategic approch. Importantly, he draws a distinction between states and "non-state actors" (such as Hamas) for whom recogition is a key objective.

Ross has much more to say, all of it very well-resoned. This article certainlt whets my appetiate for reading his new book "Statecraft."

August 3, 2007

Prince Hassen to Taliban: "What you are doing is unconscionable for Muslims.”

I wish I had more time today to discuss this very important statement by HRH Prince Hassen of Jordan, in which he not only forcefully denounces the holding of Korean hostages by the Taliban in Afghanistan, but he does so in powerful, and powerfully Islamic, terms.  But let me at least flag it here, and encourage you to add your comments by clicking on “comment” (duh) below.

Here's the key sentance: As a Muslim and a descendent of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), I can claim cultural and religious affinity with those who would act in my name and say to them: “What you are doing is unconscionable for Muslims.”

 Hat tip to Jew School; I have not yet seen this statement posted elsewhere, not even on (of course!) the Prince’s personal website.

Feed Subscription