Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »

September 28, 2007

Reflections on Justice

Shelley Lindauer is the Executive Director of the Women of Reform Judaism.

 

It’s September 11th, 2007.  I’m used to feeling sad, angry, and anxious on this day.  For some reason, though, this year seems almost like 2001: more painful, more frightening.  I’m reliving the day when I rushed, crying and scared, to pick up my son from school.  Where were all the other parents?  Didn’t they get it?  I can’t reach my daughter, a college freshman just beginning her first year away from home, and in Boston, where one of the planes originated.  My ex-husband, my son, and I, all huddled, shivering, under blankets in my den, glued to the television set.

 So, why is this year so difficult for me?  As Women of Reform Judaism prepares for its 46th Assembly, held concurrently with the Union for Reform Judaism Biennial, in December in San Diego, I am reviewing resolutions submitted by our sisterhoods for approval by our delegates.  One resolution, “Human Rights and the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp”, has, I realized, brought me back to September 11th, 2001. Our proposed resolution calls upon Congress and the president for the reinstatement of the right of Habeas Corpus, the closing of the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp, observance of the Geneva Conventions and the Convention on Torture in the interrogations of prisoners, and the use of criminal courts, or where appropriate, proper military courts convened under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for the prosecution of the those suspected of crimes with the same rights of any other defendants in either system. I am in complete agreement with this proposed resolution.  Yet, after reading our background summary, doubt has crept into my mind.  One sentence in particular, which makes the case for restoring the right of Habeas Corpus, has me questioning my certainty: “…the United States is not facing an invasion or a rebellion at this time.”  What is an invasion?  Do flying planes used as bombs smashing into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon qualify?  But, that was just one time, and it was six years ago. Is this an invasion? I go to the Merriam-Webster dictionary for edification:  Main Entry: in·vade
Pronunciation: in-'vAd
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): in·vad·ed; in·vad·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin invadere, from in- + vadere to go -- more at WADE
1 : to enter for conquest or plunder
2 : to encroach upon : INFRINGE
3 a : to spread over or into as if invading : PERMEATE <doubts invade his mind> b : to affect injuriously and progressively <gangrene invades healthy tissue>
synonym see TRESPASS I spend a great deal of time thinking about this.  Yes, we were attacked by terrorists and continue to acknowledge their threat, but certainly we are not being invaded.  As the angst of this past September 11th recedes, I consider whether it was fear that made our legislators take such an egregious action as to suspend portions of the oldest written constitution in force in the world, to ignore the values and protections that make the United States unique among nations?  Surely our representatives were subject to the same feelings of violation and vulnerability that I, along with everyone else in the country, felt on that horrific day. But would we not expect them to be able to suspend their personal feelings and consider the bigger, and more lasting, issues?  What would the writers of the constitution, our Founding Fathers, have done had they been here on September 11th, 2001?  The answer to this question is clear to me – I found it in the constitution.    

September 27, 2007

"Their plight is our shame and their promise is our future"

Tonight (Thursday) the Senate voted 67-29 to provide health insurance to 4 million uncovered children under the critical S-CHIP program.  The House approved the program earlier this week.  President Bush has said he will veto the bill, setting up crucial veto override votes in the House and Senate.  (Details on the vote are here; our recent Action Alert is here.) 

 

Assuming that the President does indeed veto the bill, there will be lots of things to say about this between now and the override votes.  I doubt, though, that any of those things will be more eloquent or powerful than this Open Letter to President Bush from Rev. Jim Wallis at Sojourners.  

Wallis reflects on a meeting about poverty with then-President Elect Bush in an Austin church. He writes of that meeting: “You asked us questions. One was, ‘How do I speak to the soul of America?’ I remember answering that one by saying to focus on the children. Their plight is our shame and their promise is our future. Reach them and you reach our soul. You nodded in agreement.” 

Wallis concludes:

 How have your priorities stayed so far from those children, whom you once agreed were so central to the soul of the nation? What do they need to do to get your attention again? You will be literally barraged by the religious community across the political spectrum this week, imploring you not to veto children's health care. I would just ask you to take your mind back to a little meeting in a Baptist Sunday school classroom, not far away from where you grew up. Remember that day, what we all talked about, what was on your heart, and how much hope there was in the room. Mr. President, recall that day, take a breath, and say a prayer before you decide to turn away from the children who are so important to our nation's soul and to yours.

September 21, 2007

Guardians of the Earth

Rabbi Mark Kaiserman is a rabbi at Temple Emanu-El of West Essex, Livingston, New Jersey. He delivered this sermon on Rosh Hashanah morning.

Growing up in Brooklyn, “nature” wasn’t something we really dealt with. Sometimes, my connection to the natural world seemed limited to the weeds growing in the cracks of the sidewalk and to my mom yelling at me to get away from that injured pigeon (true story).

To be fair, I did live across the street from Prospect Park and both my parents have green thumbs and made a beautiful backyard. But living in the big city, it was natural to grow unconcerned with the environment.

The suburbs have a lot more nature than the city, but it’s easy enough for it to become nothing more than scenery or inconvenience: a yard mowed by a lawn service; a deer that nearly clips your car; a sunset colored by the haze of pollution. Humans have always had to adapt to the elements around us. As our mastery over the environment has grown, we can overpower or ignore our connection with the natural world.

As Jews moved from being farmers to urban dwellers, they found that Judaism still enabled interaction with nature. While the prayer for rain may not have held nearly as much relevance for Jews who moved to London or Minsk, our holidays are still based on the sun and the moon. In a couple weeks, we’ll build an outdoor hut and wave natural plant species on Sukkot. We explore Bible stories that are nature bound – from Noah’s Ark to the burning bush.

In our own lives, we reconnect with nature when we take a trip to the Rocky Mountains or the Caribbean or perhaps ski down a magnificent slope. The pristine wonder of nature still inspires us. Yet we need not go far. A trip to the zoo with a small child or a walk through a botanic garden can link us to the heaven and earth that Genesis says God created in six days.

Perhaps because of my urban upbringing, I have always enjoyed brief journeys into the natural world. But that left me with a “here” and “there” approach. “There” is the beauty of nature I cherish. “Here” I don’t really think about it. It was only when I began to bike ride as an adult that I uncovered the natural world right before me. Here is there. Biking – whether in Livingston or off in more obscure, and usually far too hilly, parts of the world – forces you to interact with the environment more directly. From the elevations in the road to changes in the weather, from interacting with human beings in their cars to discovering wildlife and scenic visions in the most unlikely places, I found a new sense of wonder and appreciation for the earth and my role in it. With appreciation comes concern and the desire to protect. 

We are guardians of the earth. Shomrei Adamah in Hebrew. It isn’t a new job. It was first given to Adam in the Garden of Eden by God. Just as God created the first human being, God placed him in the Garden “to till and to tend it.”[1] We maintain that divine role of guarding and caring for the world. According to one early Midrash, God said to Adam, “Look at My works, how beautiful and praiseworthy they are! Everything that I created, I created for you. Take care that you do not damage and destroy My world, for if you damage it, there is no one to repair it afterwards!”[2]

Regardless of their historical accuracy, the focus of the Torah on stories such as Adam and Noah emphasize the importance of human responsibility to the natural world. And let’s be honest, we’ve done a pretty crummy job. As technology has allowed to us to leave no spot unexplored, few natural elements that we can’t overcome or resist, and as our need for resources grow and grow, we have treated the planet much like a High School senior whose parents have been away for the weekend. We’re sorry now for breaking the vase when we played ball in the house, and we know the crystal egg on the mantle has that nasty crack, but we feel we did okay in caring for the house because we haven’t burned it down. But when mom and dad go away again, we’ll happily try to push it to the limit. We need to be better guardians of the earth. 

Any discussion on the environment finds solutions that are well known. I recently came across a lesson plan I wrote almost 20 years ago for a 6th grade class. In it, I fully expected that they already knew the three Rs – Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Basic environmentalism is something that has become part of most every American’s life. We recycle to some extent our paper, glass, and metal. We return printer cartridges to the manufacturer. Perhaps we turn off lights as we leave a room, which the TV show Mythbusters confirmed does save electricity. We may do environmentally friendly things because they feel right, or they look cool, or because they save us money, or simply because they’ve been drilled into us.

Everywhere we look, big companies are making environmentalism a part of their standard operating procedure. Hotels now give you the option of not replacing your towels and sheets every day. Maybe they do it for monetary reasons, but it helps the environment too.

Environmentalism has become very trendy. Rock groups such as Linkin Park and My Chemical Romance run environmentally friendly concerts. There are reality shows like The EcoZone Project that focus on a green way life. One thing I’ve learned about pop culture in 2007: Once you have a rock group, a reality show, and a spokesperson like Leonardo DiCaprio fronting your cause, you have hit the big time.

But as much as environmentalism, “going Green,” is a part of life, we don’t fully engage. Our commitment is inconsistent, timid, and casual. We know it’s the right thing to do. We know it might make us feel better and even save us money, but we don’t do enough. We recycle the newspaper, but not the junk mail. We do cans, but not bottles. We buy local organic if we have a little extra time. We turn down the air-conditioning, except when it’s hot. We’re a bit more aquamarine than we are forest green.

If I had a PowerPoint display and an elevated platform, I suppose we could talk about the critical path we are stumbling down in the world. God told us that there would be no one to repair it if we destroyed it. And yet we still don’t make the active efforts to respond to what is already a worldwide crisis.

One person can’t make a real difference, we think. And yet we know that’s not true in other issues of social justice. We all make an impact on the world individually. Take garbage. Every day we throw away some amount of garbage. Over our lifetime that adds up to about 45 tons of garbage.[3] The younger you are, the higher the total. One person alone can make a difference negatively. Or by changing our habits, one person can help be a guardian of the world. “It is not your responsibility to complete the work,” Pirke Avot reminds us, “but neither are you free to ignore your responsibilities.”[4] 

Today is the world’s birthday. What better present could we give it, other than perhaps an iPhone, than our new commitment towards its long-term health. So let’s each do one super-simple, no sweat thing. How many congregants does it take to put in a light bulb? Let’s hope it’s a lot. By now, most of you know about Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs or CFLs. The swirl bulb, as it is sometimes called, is an alternative light bulb to the standard. Now, the only time I deal with light bulbs as a rabbi is that some grooms step on one instead of a glass at the end of a wedding. And  I know that you shouldn’t step on CFL bulbs because they should be recycled.

What I do know is that when you buy a CFL, you better like it because it lasts as long as 10 years and will save you at least $55 in energy costs over that lifetime for each bulb. The cost of a bulb will be paid for in about 3 months. If every home in America replaced one 60-watt bulb with a CFL equivalent, the energy saved would power the city of Philadelphia.[5] Even West Orange, the home of the light bulb, is advocating CFLs are part of their current citywide light bulb celebration.

Wal-Mart has been pushing CFL bulbs trying to get every customer to buy one. You can’t get more mainstream than Wal-Mart as it strives to position itself as an energy activist. While Wal-Mart may try to get you to buy a bulb, Temple Emanu-El wants to do one better. Upon leaving services this morning, we will be distributing one 60-watt equivalent CFL bulb to every family. Free. Take it home. Replace some table lamp’s 60-watt bulb with this one and compare them. They both make the house bright. But one does it using 75% less energy and lasts eight times longer. One bulb will ultimately cost you far less and is better for our environment.

But you don’t have one socket in your house; you have between 50 and 100. No really, you do. To help populate your home full of CFLs, order forms for 60, 75, and 100 watt equivalent bulbs will also being handed out through a special program organized by our Social Action Committee. Only 5% of US light bulbs are CFLs. Each of us can nudge that number higher. CFLs are also available in numerous shapes, sizes, and wattages from stores like Home Depot and IKEA, and online. They should be recycled instead of tossed into the garbage. We’re giving you your first bulb – only one per household please. Now you do the rest. And plan ahead – buy them eight at a time; they make great Chanukah gifts. 

There are lots of ways each of us can make an environmental difference in our own homes, families, jobs. It takes some initial effort and sometimes some cost. Those are typical stumbling blocks. Mark Twain noted this human condition suggesting: “Do something every day that you don’t want to do; this is the golden rule for acquiring the habit of doing your duty without pain.”

But once in place, such actions become invisible or part of our way of life. They may come with significant cost savings in the longer run. But mostly they are our obligation as Americans, as Earthlings, and as Jews. Judaism is filled with laws on caring for the environment and for the world around us. In the Torah, we learn that when holding a city under military siege, we cannot cut down fruit trees surrounding the walled city for army use.[6] Their value of the trees exceeds our personal need. We often speak of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world. As we care for our fellow human beings, our efforts must extend to repairing and saving the animals and nature across the globe.

Let’s start with recycling. When I was a kid, I found it embarrassing to have sort my garbage into different categories. My friends weren’t doing it. Our recycling had to be taken off to various recycling stations and drop off points. Now, the local township comes right to my door and takes it all for me. And they recycle more than ever before. In Livingston, for example, they accept pizza boxes and water bottles and grocery store plastic bags which otherwise would get thrown away. You don’t even have to separate out the metal and plastics. It takes far fewer resources to turn our recyclables into brand new products than to create a product from scratch. When done to the fullest, we can recycle as much as 75% of our trash.[7] That’s almost 34 tons of the garbage each and every one of us creates in our lifetimes. Each of us can make a difference.

Temple Emanu-El is renewing its commitment to recycling. This fall, additional recycling bins will be placed throughout the building. Our religious school will learn about Judaism and the environment and their role in it. And to show my support, I will recycle this sermon on Yom Kippur (Just kidding).

There are so many little things we can do. Some of them you might be doing already. We can run the dishwasher only when it’s full. That saves 7300 gallons of water a year. Don’t stand with the fridge door open! Opening the refrigerator door counts for as much as $60 of your yearly electric bill. If you have a teenage son, double that. Instead of simply recycling junk mail, get off as many lists as possible. Tell catalogs you don’t use to stop sending them to you and use one of the online junk mail services to reduce your overall total.

If you can’t or don’t know how to recycle something, reuse it or help someone else who has a use for your junk. Isn’t that really what eBay is all about? Take sports equipment. It usually sits in the garage until we throw it away. Temple member Dylan McCauley, who becomes bar mitzvah in just over two weeks, collected old sports equipment from friends and neighbors. This summer at a garage sale, he found an international need for this old stuff. One man bought baseball equipment for a little league team in the Dominican Republic. Another bought soccer balls for Haitian children living in South Africa. And with the funds raised, Dylan had enough money to sponsor a little league team here in Orange. Instead of a landfill or a garage, the equipment is being used in many ways and no one has to buy or make new stuff.

We live in a world of endless supply. Whatever we want, as long as we have money, is there for us. We never consider that each item has to be created, which requires resources and energy. Just because we CAN buy new stuff doesn’t mean we should. And especially as Jews, we have to always recognize that energy isn’t limitless and it comes quite often from countries that wish only evil towards Israel. The more we can reduce America’s and the world’s dependence on Jew-hating oil rich countries, the less political power those countries have.[8]

The green movement has never simply been about doing what’s best for the earth. Environmentalism has dramatic economic and political impact and choices. Do we drill for oil in Alaska at the expense of the Artic National Wildlife Refuge? How do we balance recycling and reusing products with the resulting loss of jobs in manufacturing industries? What are we to believe on the conflicting scientific reports on the dangers and effectiveness of alternative energies from coal to nuclear to solar to wind?

Environmental activism gets mixed in with political parties such as the Green Party and with those on the extremes such as the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. People that strive to help the earth sometimes become arrogant in their own self-righteousness. An episode of South Park last year showed the Colorado town overrun with pollution after everyone began buying hybrid cars in a effort to save the world. The deadly clouds that filled the atmosphere weren’t smog, we learned, but smug.

Doomsday scenarios have especially become popular as inspiration to environmental action. They make for good theater, but I don’t think they motivate most people to awareness. We don’t need to be scared of the world, but inspired by it. The more aware and in touch we are of the world, the more we care about it. The more we care about it, the more we strive to protect and nurture it. Perhaps the best thing you can do for the environment is to go experience it.

So make that next vacation in the Grand Canyon or Napa Valley or the Serengeti or Alaska. Go skiing in Vermont or bike with me on the next Hazon Ride. Go for a jog in the South Mountain Reservation or take a weekend down the shore. Listen to the sounds of the birds and the wind, take in the scents of the variety of flowers in your garden, aim your telescope at the stars, enjoy the flavors at a nearby farmer’s market, or watch some Discovery channel special. By engaging, you move towards your role as a guardian of the world. 

This synagogue and all houses of worship need to lead the way. We must model the behavior, and reap both the financial and moral benefits, of creating a greener environment and guarding our precious planet.

A synagogue-wide audit will be conducted this fall to see how we might make changes in various aspects of Temple life to be more environmentally friendly and “to till and to tend” our world. From choices on light bulbs to cleaning products, fair trade coffee to appliances, there is so much we can explore and consider. If you have interest in being part of our synagogue green audit, please contact the Temple office. While we can’t do everything, there is so much we can do. This year, look for several environmentally focused programs and speakers at Temple, including our annual pet blessing. Some people try to argue that if they don’t come to Temple they save fuel, but I think that whatever you are doing instead often consumes more energy and rarely provides as much replenishment. Plus, you can always ride a bike here. Temple Emanu-El, thanks to the Confirmation Class of 2006, now has a beautiful bicycle rack out front. I have parked my bike there today so you can see it on your way out. Feel free to ride your bicycle here or anywhere and get a workout for your body and soul.

On your way out, you’ll be getting a sheet that lists a few ideas for you and your family to incorporate into your lives. You already have a head start on one of those ideas with the CFL Light bulb, one to a family. I hope you’ll save this list, post it on your fridge, and use it as inspiration for the coming months to add one new thing each month. And make sure to recycle it when its time has passed. 

There’s a classic Jewish folktale of two people fighting over a piece of land. Each claimed ownership, and each bolstered the claim with apparent proof. After arguing for a long time, they agreed to resolve their conflict by putting the case before a rabbi. The rabbi sat as an arbitrator and listened carefully, but despite years of legal training the rabbi could not reach a decision. Both parties seemed to be right. Finally the rabbi said, “Since I cannot decide to whom this land belongs, let’s ask the land.” The rabbi put an ear to the ground, and after a moment stood up. “My friends, the land said it belongs to neither of you – but that you belong to it.”[9]

We are privileged to till and tend this world. We are guardians of her present and caretakers of her future. As we damage and destroy God’s world today, there is no one to repair it. It may take commitment, creativity, and personal change, but this year let’s embrace what we can do – in our families, our houses, our Temple, our jobs, and our world – to experience, appreciate, and care for the only home we have.


[1] Genesis 2:15.
[2] Midrash Kohelet Rabbah 7.
[3] Let the Earth Teach You Torah, Ellen Bernstein and Dan Fink, p. 90.
[4] Pirke Avot 2:21.
[5] www.fastcompany.com/magazine/108/open_lightbulbs.html.
[6] Deuteronomy 20:19-20.
[7] www.oroloma.org/resources/kidscorner/earthday/2005/recyclingFacts.html.
[8] “Why going Green will make the world safer for Jews – and everyone else.” Thomas L. Friedman interviewed by Robert S. Greenberger. Moment, August 2007, p. 72.

[9] Source unknown.

September 20, 2007

Food Stamp Challenge - I Ended Mine, Millions Cannot

6:00 a.m.  LaGuardia.  US Air Shuttle.  I am typing over a breakfast consisting of a McDonald’s Egg McMuffin (without cheese) and a cup of tea – a luxury that during the past week I could not have afforded.  Indeed, it cost 30 cents more than my daily allotment for food over the last week.

A week has passed since Erev Rosh Hashanah (note the ethical dilemma about that below) when I, with a number of other Reform, Conservative, and Reconstructionist rabbis across the nation, began our participation during these Days of Awe in the “food stamp challenge.”  The purpose, of course, is to experience, for one week, the daily challenges and frustrations of trying to feed yourself on what our food stamp program provides for its recipients. 

The Food Stamp Program is remarkable program, serving more people than any other low income program; it is fast to enroll in, with millions moving on and off over a year, as they face temporary difficulties.  It literally makes the difference between sustenance and malnutrition to millions of families. 

But it also makes every day daunting. 

The Food Stamp Program allows individuals $1 per meal, or $21 per week.  It means scouring the paper for coupons, the grocery store for sales, calculating to the penny which foods are cheapest. Pasta and rice, beans, bananas:  Doable for a week, but beyond that? 

What I forgot when we agreed to do this the week between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur was that I would be traveling for much of the week.  At home, the regimen is conceivable; on the road, it is, as best I can ascertain, simply impossible to have three meals a day.  I made it by reducing my intake to the equivalent of a meal and a half a day. 

Typical day: a donut for 78 cents and a cup of tap water for breakfast (or if I were home, it was a bowl of cereal with a banana and tea – with three cups from one tea bag. (I mostly swore off bread for the week).  Lunch:  carrots and apple or banana (from a stand) and a large glass of tap water.  Dinner, if at home, rice and beans or pasta. 

When I was out all day (4 of the days), it meant skipping one meal entirely.  The one time I split a late night light beer I passed on dinner. Twice I splurged for a slice of pizza – once for $1.68 and the other a larger slice for $2.25 that I split with Al and Shirley Vorspan (two for the three of us), relishing it as we told jokes.  For merely one week, such tradeoffs and choices were fascinating, instructive and to be candid a source of bemused appreciation for my friends.  But for the millions who have no choice but to make painful tradeoffs in order to feed their families, this exercise is not a matter of instruction, but of survival.   

The best meal?  The first was dinner with two other participants, Rabbis Rachel Cowan and Steve Gutow at Rachel’s apartment in New York.  Steve, the dynamic head of the Jewish Council on Public Affairs, conceived of choosing this week for rabbis to participate. Rachel is one of the truly visionary rabbis of this generation; most relevant for this week, she concocted some of kind of bean soup (I forgot to ask because I was absorbed in eating what was the most delicious soup I think possible on this diet). 

The most amusing?  I was visiting with Al Engelberg, a generous and creative donor to the RAC.  (We all owe Al a debt of gratitude for groundbreaking legal cases that enabled the generic drug industry to develop.)  Inadvertently, my staff had arranged for me to join him for lunch.  When we met up, I explained the situation and told him I would be delighted to sit with him at the nice restaurant he had chosen but I could not eat.  His face lit up.  Without missing a beat, he said, “David, secretly I love going to McDonald’s so I sneak out once in awhile.  You give me a legitimate reason to head there. Let’s go get you the $1 meal.” And off we went! 

Dollar meals at McDonald’s when you’re traveling: Not the healthiest, but at least good tasting filler.   

Most frustrating meals?  All the lovely receptions accompanying my speaking engagements, where I could eat almost nothing.  I even had to pass on the bottled water on the stage (fortunately at last night’s they put out a pitcher of tap water). 

Then, the final ethical dilemma.  I began after dinner on Erev Rosh Hashanah.  So, was this week a Jewish week that allowed me to resume normal meals beginning with dinner last night? Or was it a U.S. week, which would have begun after my three meals last Wednesday, requiring me not to eat normally until breakfast today? 

I split the difference, sitting with a cup of tea through an early dinner with Rabbi Marla Feldman, our superb Director of the Commission on Social Action, and Naomi Abelson, the CSA’s new Congregational Relations Manager before my talk at the Center for Modern Jewish History on "Jewish Lawyers in the Civil Rights Movement."  Late last night I had an appetizer – I was keenly aware that at $7, it would have fed me those on food stamps for more than two days every week, every month, every year. 

We can do better in this, the wealthiest country in the history of humankind.  We can lift those on welfare out of poverty.

Our tradition suggests that in this week of reflection we should act as if all the good deeds and all the bad deeds of the world hang in a balance and what we do next will tip the scales.  We can act to tip the scales to justice for the poor and hungry of America. Let us act to ensure that this coming year is such a year of justice and fairness for America and all its people.  

From my family to yours: Have an easy fast; think of the hungry of America when you do; and let it be a year of sweetness, health, and fulfillment for you and your loved ones.

Mobilizing a Movement

Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner is the Director of Just Congregations, the Reform Movement's congregation-Based Community Organizing effort, under the auspices of the Commission on Social Action.

This week The Nation published an article exploring the fast-growing trend of synagogues becoming involved in congregation-based community organizing.  Writers Drier and May correctly observe that across the country, more and more Jewish congregations are joining broad-based organizations in order to build power for social change in their own communities.  We have seen this trend most significantly in the Reform movement, with last year’s launch of Just Congregations, an initiative devoted to this work, of which I am the founding director.

In synagogues across the country, the impact of organizing is incredible.  Last weekend, I attended an assembly at Congregation Solel in Highland Park, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago.  More than one hundred temple members attended this gathering, an amazing turnout on the Sunday after Rosh Hashana and the first day of religious school.  Clearly, they were committed to the project.

 

The assembly was the culmination of a one-to-one campaign, in which 113 members of the congregation met for nearly an hour in pairs to discuss their visions for a more just community.  Part of the assembly was a celebration of this campaign.  Having more than one hundred members of a congregation share their stories and concerns is a tremendous step in building a real community.  The majority of the meeting was devoted to telling some of the compelling stories heard during the campaign.  One member wept as she described the discrimination her adopted son faced at the town’s majority-white high school.  Another told of the struggle to care for her aging mother.  The assembled members committed to join together on behalf of the synagogue to work on issues related to education and elder care.

 

The meeting was organized by Lake County United, an affiliate of the Industrial Areas Foundation started by Saul Alinsky in the forties (and described in The Nation article).  Attending the meeting were leaders of various community churches and synagogues.  A highlight came when a leader from the local mosque spoke on behalf of the five Muslims who attended with him.  He not only celebrated Solel’s commitment to working with the churches and mosques through Lake County United, he also thanked the Reform movement because of Rabbi Eric Yoffie’s historic speech at ISNA.

 

Having built the relationships within their temple walls, and also having reached beyond to other Jews, Christians, and Muslims, Solel is ready to act powerfully on the issues of social justice its members care deeply about.  We are seeing work like Solel’s all over the country.

 

I want to offer one last reflection about The Nation article.  Though it tells excellent stories of successful organizing campaigns in Boston and California, reflecting work across the county, the piece alluded to this work as “left wing.”  I would argue that organizing transcends the neat categories of the political spectrum.  The organizing approach is thoroughly non-partisan, although it is totally political.  Let me explain this distinction further: organizing teaches local institutions how to engage collectively to promote the common good, not fulfill the platform of any particular party.  It brings synagogues into full civic engagement, but congregations involved in organizing never endorse candidates or parties.  Instead, by seeking out community passions, we often see Democrats and Republicans uniting around common stories—air pollution creating asthma, school truancy, nursing care quality.  None of those are partisan issues.  Indeed, having myself organized for nearly a decade in Massachusetts, where we currently have single party rule, I have seen for myself how often organizing leads to holding Democrats accountable.  By organizing, congregations build power for the just society they envision, regardless of the party in power.

'Getting' Health Care

Everyone is talking about health care.  Our Presidential candidates are revealing their visions for the future of our nation’s health care, Congress is trying to reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, and now, Wal-Mart is offering its employees better, more expansive health care benefits.  After being heavily criticized by organizations like Families USA for their substandard benefits, Wal-Mart has revamped their health care package to provide more complete and accessible health care.

According to the September 19th New York Times article, Wal-Mart is hoping to remove “any barriers of entry to the company’s health care plan.”  I want to applaud Wal-Mart for this much-overdue effort, but I also want to ask, who is teaching the Wal-Mart employees and, for that matter, the rest of the nation, how to make sense of the jargon and nuance of the insurance system in our country?

The Times article notes that the new Wal-Mart coverage plan will offer “offers 50 ways to customize coverage, with varying trade-offs like higher premiums and lower deductibles.”  With such a large number of choices, how can Wal-Mart employees, many of whom have probably never had health insurance before, determine which plan will be best for them?  The challenge of interpreting and understanding insurance plans seems to remain a barrier for giving people the best, most affordable and appropriate health care.  Over the past few weeks, I have had repeated conversations with young professionals who are struggling to understand the plans that their companies are offering them.  Our nation’s young college graduates, as well as our nation’s Wal-Mart employees, have trouble understanding our health care system.  In order for us to truly provide more comprehensive health care for our citizens, we need to envision a complete overhaul which includes better education, or available counseling, in our businesses and schools about health care plans.  Health care should not only be accessible, but understandable and tangible.               

September 19, 2007

Democracy Denied

On Tuesday, our nation’s Senators cast historic votes to continue denying voting representation for residents of the District of Columbia.  Don’t be deceived though, the Senate didn’t even vote against the actual bill that would have granted DC a full voting member in the House of Representatives. Instead, the Senate flat out refused to debate the constitutional merits of such a bill due to the threat of a filibuster.

 As Senator Orrin Hatch stated in a floor speech yesterday preceding the vote, "When has the U.S. Senate been afraid to debate a constitutional issue as important as this one?"  In my frustration and disappointment with the failed cloture vote, I can only second the Senator’s question: Have American politicians become so removed from the democratic process that they no longer welcome struggling with and debating constitutionality?

As Jews, we are taught to struggle with the meaning of the Torah like the great sages of our past and to value debate with G-d as did Abraham when he bargained to save the residents of Sodom (Genesis 18:22-33).   Taking these Jewish traditions to heart, what is personally most disheartening about Tuesday’s vote to maintain the status quo of disenfranchisement is the fact that the Senators simply voted to avoid the issue.  Perhaps the DC voting rights bill was unconstitutional, perhaps it wasn’t; maybe the filibuster was warranted in order to discuss constitutionality, and maybe it was an overly aggressive approach. But one thing is certain, the bill (and our Constitution) deserved a full debate.  Forty three Senators were unwilling to discuss the merits of the DC House Voting Rights Act of 2007, but I send a sincere thank you to those Senators who still remember what American democracy is all about.

September 18, 2007

Constitutional Facts & Myths

I have been carrying around this recent study by the First Amendment Center for a week now, trying to figure out what to make of it.

Its most disturbing finding? I cannot really choose among these:

  • 65% of Americans believe that the nation’s founders intended the U.S. to be a Christian nation;
  • 55% believe that that the Constitution establishes a Christian nation;
  • Under 2/3’s of those sampled (56%) believe that the freedom to worship applies to all religious groups; and
  • Half (50%) would allow schools to teach the Bible as a factual text in a history class.

The exact wording of the questions, and the full results (which concern the whole array of Constitutional freedoms), are available here.

What is the good news in the poll? Perhaps this: To the extent that it demonstrates that there is a vast amount of ignorance about fundamental constitutional principles, the poll suggests an array of areas in which we need to intensify our educational work. We certainly have our work cut out for us in this crucial area.

September 17, 2007

A Story That’s Not as Bizarre as it Should Be

Last week, the New York Times printed an article describing the horrific and startlingly strange experience of a young woman who was held captive, sexually assaulted, stabbed, beaten and burned for over a week by a former boyfriend, a rag-tag group of his friends, and (this is where it turns truly bizarre) his mother. This young woman’s story belongs in a horror flick script more than it does in a newspaper—yet stories of torture, assault and abuse are far more prevalent than we think.

Violence against women knows no boundaries, be it class, ethnicity, religion or geography. At this very moment it is happening across the globe and around the corner. According to a DOJ study, nearly one fifth of all women in America have been raped in their lifetimes and, on average, over 360,000 women are raped each year. And these statistics do not encompass the wider variety of violence against women, including physical assault, abuse, stalking and emotional abuse.

 

Women are being attacked all around us, yet so little clamor is being made. Last year there were two widely publicized school shootings, but the deluge of news coverage glossed over the fact that the shooters deliberately targeted young girls. As Kim Gandy, president of NOW, pointed out in the aftermath, “Had students from a specific racial or religious group been targeted for murder, it seems likely that the killings would have been deemed hate crimes immediately and vigorously. Not so when gender is the target.”

 

When one considers the abundance of violence at home, along with the litany of abuses suffered by women abroad—including the use of rape as a terror tactic in conflict-torn regions like Sudan—it would seem that an all-out war on women is being waged. Combine that with the long- and short-term effects violence against women has on all areas of life and society, and it is impossible to understand why there isn’t greater outrage from the populace. Survivors experience much higher rates of depression, post traumatic stress disorder and drug and alcohol abuse as a result of their attacks; a Department of Justice study shows that 90% of the children of survivors of domestic violence witnessed the attacks against their mothers and these children display higher rates of depression and of becoming abusers themselves. It is imperative to remember that these girls and women are not “others,” but members of our communities, often our mothers, sisters, daughters and friends. Violence against women is pervasive, even in the Jewish community, and demands a response from everybody.

 This October is Violence Against Women Awareness Month, a perfect opportunity to reach out to the women around us to ensure that they are protected and living the peaceful lives they deserve, as well as to talk to the men and boys we love to guarantee that they learn to respect and cherish the women in their lives.

With Justice For All (Unless You're Not Covered)

Think your civil rights are safe? A new Web site from our friends at the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights is telling you to think again. ReclaimCivilRights.org aims to educate Americans about denials, loopholes and rollbacks in current federal civil rights legislation.

Think your civil rights are safe? A new Web site from our friends at the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights is telling you to think again.

ReclaimCivilRights.org aims to educate Americans about denials, loopholes and rollbacks in current federal civil rights legislation. The site’s homepage declares:

In recent years, there has been a retreat from rigorous enforcement of civil rights laws and a narrowing of the ability of ordinary Americans to vindicate their rights in court. The American ideal of equality of opportunity cannot be achieved with a system of rights without remedies.

And it’s true. Consider these examples:

  • Despite protection ensured by the Americans with Disabilities Act, courts often rule that a variety of circumstances don’t count as disabilities. Courts upheld Wal-Mart’s decision to fire a diabetic pharmacist because he asked to leave the pharmacy on his lunch break to give himself insulin shots.

  • In July, the House of Representatives passed the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to ensure women the right to go to court if they discover their wages are unfairly lower than male coworkers’. The bill passed, but a surprising 199 Representatives voted against protecting women’s rights in the workplace, and President Bush has threatened to veto the bill.

  • The Prison Litigation Reform Act’s Physical Injury Requirement requires abused prisoners to prove bodily injury in order to file lawsuits. Some courts have ruled that rape, mental abuse and other gross civil rights violations do not inflict physical injury, deeming victims ineligible to take their cases to court.

The list goes on. Maybe you’re saying, “I’m not a diabetic or a woman or a prisoner: This doesn’t affect me.” Yet the Talmud teaches us, "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor” (Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 31a); if our neighbors are denied their civil rights, we are commanded to treat these injustices as though they were done to us. As Jews and compassionate human beings, it is our duty to care about and work toward legislative equality for everyone – not just to better our own lives, but to better the world.

September 12, 2007

New Year's Resolution: Improve our Children's Futures

For the Jewish community, September (usually!) means the start of the New Year.  My focus during the holidays and, in particular, during the Days of Awe, has always been how to improve myself, my community, and my world. 

For America’s youth, September means the start of a new school year.  Unfortunately for the millions of children who attend poorly funded, under-staffed, and ineffective public schools, the new school year does not inspire hope for a brighter future. 

 

            But recently, Congress took steps to fix this crisis. On August 28th, Representatives George Miller (D-CA), Chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Howard McKeon (R-CA), the committee’s Ranking Minority Member, proposed a “discussion draft” of a bill to renew and revamp the heavily-criticized “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) program.  It proposes,  among other steps, an extension of the measures that can be used for accountability purposes and an expansion of the amount of time that immigrant students can test in their native languages.  (A summary of their “Discussion Draft” is available here; The Committee also has this page collecting its work on the reauthorization of NCLB.)

The major criticism of this proposal, however, is that it does not offer sufficiently significant changes.  National Education Association (NEA) President Reg Weaver comments that “The draft that has been provided for discussion makes only minor tweaks in the divisive and dysfunctional law that parents, teachers, and public schools have been saddled with these past five years. If they’re not going to make meaningful changes that truly address the needs of America’s public school students, a major opportunity will have been missed.” (Weaver’s written testimony is available here, and you can view his testimony here.)

 I continue to be inspired by those who refuse to settle for mediocrity and speak out against changes to our educational system that is simply not good enough.  While we should commend the drafters for making educational reform a priority, we must challenge them to offer legislation that will truly have a positive affect.

I know that the spirit of reform displayed this week, by activists and politicians alike will continue to inspire me.  In the year 5768, the Jewish community must take a leadership role in supporting America’s commitment to improving our nation’s educational system and with it, the lives of all our children.

 

Rise in Rent, but Reason to Hope

The numbers are in. And it ain't pretty. "Housing costs ate up more of the monthly paycheck for millions of Americans in 2006 than the year before," the New York Times reported today. Half of all renters and 37 percent of mortgage holders—up from 35 percent in 2005, an increase of more than 1.5 million households—spent at least 30 percent of their income on housing costs. Fortunately, Congress has the chance to act—and it appears that it might.

Housing costs are on the rise and wages are just not keeping up. When rent costs rise for middle-income Americans, it might mean fewer trips to the movies or out to dinner. For low-income Americans, the consequences are graver—sometimes forcing parents to skip a meal so their children can eat or an elderly couple to chop their meds in half so they can wait to buy their next prescription.

If the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund Act (H.R. 2895) becomes law, then millions of Americans won't have to make those choices. The bill, sponsored by Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), would "establish a National Housing Trust Fund with ongoing, permanent, dedicated and sufficient sources of revenue to build, rehabilitate and preserve 1.5 million units of housing for the lowest income families over the next 10 years," according to the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), which supports the bill.

H.R. 2895 is headed to the House floor after being passed out of the House Committee on Financial Services by a bipartisan vote of 45-23. This is the first time a trust fund housing bill has gone to the floor and affordable housing advocates are hopeful. The NLIHC has a list of current co-sponsors of the bill. Call your Representative—either to thank them for co-sponsoring the bill, or to encourage them to do so. Otherwise next year when you’re reading the Times, it could feel like deja vu all over again.

September 10, 2007

Guest: Whose Ambivalence?

Erin Scharff is a former Eisendrath Legislative Assistant at the Religious Action Center.  She now works with Service Employees International Union (SEIU).  The views expressed are her own.

The New York Times is once again running a series on wealth in America.  (I had that the style section would be enough coverage, but that's another story.   Last week, they looked at tax breaks for charitable donations (always an interesting topic.)  As a guest, I probably shouldn't bore you with  my overly wonky interest in tax policy, but I do think it's important to call the Times out when the perpetuate a myth. 

The Times wrote that Americans are "at best ambivalent about using tax dollars in such assistance."  But, this simply isn't true. 

Americans vastly over-estimate how much we spend.  In a 2002 poll by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations and the German Marshall Fund, the median estimate for foreign aid was twenty-five percent.  Only two percent of Americans correctly guess that we actually spend less than 1% of our budget.  

Nevertheless, Americans are still willing to spend their tax dollars to fight poverty.  According to a study by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policies Attitudes, a majority of Americans support spending American tax dollars to pursue the Millennium Development Goals to end poverty in the developing world.  Over eighty percent of Americans support a plan to reduce world hunger in half by 2015, and most of these people would be willing to pay more taxes to reach that goal. 

It's statistics like this that make me proud to be an American.  If only our policy makers and opinion makers would take heed.

P.S. I wrote the Public Editor to correct the piece.  I'll let you know if I get a response.

September 7, 2007

It’s (still) the Economy, Stupid (even for Religious Voters)

The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, which is quickly becoming one of the most valuable resources for data on religion, politics, and their influence on one another, has a very interesting new poll out on “Religion and Campaign 08.”  (For the hard core among you, the questionnaire itself is available here.)

 

It’s difficult to pull together any type of comprehensive analysis of the wide-raging results.  In its own summary, Pew highlights the perceived religiosity of the leading candidates (Romney is seen as the “most religious” (although it’s not clear that helps him; his Mormonism remains a real issue for voters), and Giuliani and Clinton are seen as the least “religious.”  (It is, to say the least, interesting to read this together with a story in the new issue of Mother Jones (“Hillary's Prayer: Hillary Clinton's Religion and Politics”) which reports on her long-standing participation in a “secretive” Capitol Hill prayer group.)

I think that more important the findings about particular candidates – which will clearly rise and fall in the year (the year!) between now and the election – is the data showing what voters are interested in.  It’s not gay marriage or other “social issues.”  Here’s the key paragraph from the report:

More than three-quarters of Americans (78%) say domestic issues such as the economy, health care and the environment will be very important in their decisions about whom to support for president; 72% say the same about the war in Iraq. By comparison, just 38% say that social issues like abortion and gay marriage will be very important in their voting decisions.

it turns out that the old sign on (Bill) Clinton's Little Rock campaign headquaters is still true – it’s the economy, stupid.   And that’s a great lesson for all the candidates.

More about this data-rich poll later….

September 6, 2007

Accountability as a Means of Moving Forward: War Crimes Prosecution 100 Years Later

This Saturday night, in preparation for the holiday of Rosh Hashanah, Jews across the world will participate in a service called Selichot where prayers of forgiveness are recited.  The ritual serves an important purpose: before we ask for God’s forgiveness, we must first recognize what we have done wrong, and second, stand before the person (or in this case, deity) that we have wronged and be held accountable for our actions.  In essence, it is a ritual process that allows for moving forward and re-obtaining a clean slate or clean page in the “Book of Life.”

This logic of the Selichot service – accountability as a means for moving forward after sin— is a message which goes beyond High Holiday ritual.  In fact, it is a desire of many individuals whose societies have been broken by human rights atrocities, but who have merely seen those who committed those crimes avoid justice for reasons which are all to often political. Now, one hundred years after the Hague Rules of 1907 established the basis of war crimes prosecution, the process for accountability is quite well known.  For that reason the question we need to ask is not how to hold the world’s worst criminals accountable, but rather why it is not happening?

This question was the focus of a remarkable conference held this past weekend at which nine war crimes prosecutors from six different war crimes tribunals met to discuss the state of international justice.  The result of their meeting was a document, The First Chautauqua Declaration, which represents a multi-generational call to action for the international community to use legal tools to hold accountable those who have been wronged and to remind nations of the dangers of letting politics get in the way. 

The Declaration is a good reminder that moving forward in the wake of atrocities is a process.  Yet, it is also serves as a reminder that having the tools to move forward is not enough.  Just as Jews must make the effort through the ritual of Selichot to be held accountable, the international community needs to use the tools of international justice that it has established over the past hundred years.

September 5, 2007

Universal Health Care and the Ad Wizards at the AMA

You can’t take a bus or metro trip without missing the American Medical Association’s new—and provocative—ad campaign promoting universal healthcare. Aiming for people’s hearts and minds, the AMA hopes to push the issue to the forefront of the 2008 presidential campaign.

Lining the Metro walls are posters with doctors and patients holding stethoscopes over their mouths accompanied by various slogans. One says: “John and his doctor are fighting two ailments together. One is his diabetes. The other is his lack of health insurance.” Another notes that “1 out of 7 Americans is uninsured. This isn’t just a statistic. It’s a tragedy.” The posters direct people to http://voicefortheuninsured.org, an AMA site that offers the following proposals:

 

  • To provide all Americans with the means to purchase health care coverage.
  • To give individuals choices to select the appropriate coverage for them and their families.
  • To promote market reforms that enable this new approach.

The ad campaign comes as the presidential campaign really starts to heat up. Reads another poster: “1 out of 7 of us doesn’t have health insurance. But we all have a voice. And a vote.”

Universal healthcare shouldn’t be a partisan issue. While candidates from across the spectrum may differ on their approach, citizens should hold their feet to the fire on the campaign trail—and in the voting booth—to ensure that the next president of the United States will provide healthcare to all Americans.

September 4, 2007

Gay Rights in the Heartland

Despite their nearly five-year relationship, Trish and Kate Varnum were denied a marriage license in Polk County, Iowa. After a two-year legal battle, an Iowa District Court ruled last week that it is against the state’s Constitutional dedication to equality to deny marriage rights to same-sex couples.

In a country that has condemned discrimination on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity and everything else under the sun, it seems as though gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans comprise the only remaining group of Americans deemed unworthy of equality. With yesterday’s ruling, though, the Iowa District Court has publicly announced that it will not support the United States’ last remaining civil rights denial.

Same-sex couples flocked to the Polk County Recorders’ office to apply for marriage licenses, but for most of them, “happily ever after” didn’t yet come. Polk County Attorney John Sarcone immediately began the appeal process, encouraging Judge Robert Hanson put a stay on Iowans’ same-sex marriages. The case now heads to the Iowa Supreme Court for a final ruling, with no guarantee (but plenty of hope) for an optimistic outcome.

Still, every success begins with a single step. The Iowa court ruling is one of many small yet significant steps toward marriage equality for all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation. I eagerly await the day when a loving lesbian couple such as the Varnums can actually take their rights for granted because they cannot remember a day when those rights didn’t exist. Idealistic? I don’t think so. That day may be a long way down the road, but the stepping stones are already being laid. Kudos to Polk County, Iowa for helping break down the barriers of discrimination.