RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Neo-Classical Reform Judaism
    June 26, 2008
    Jewish Living (5 comments)

    By dcc
    I have a conundrum: I consider myself a Classical Reform Jew. I do not view the mitzvot as a to-do (or to-don't) list. I feel connected to ethical regulations, while I have no desire to return to the Temple. I am a Kohen, but have publicly renounced my priesthood. However, I don't eat pork or shellfish at home.

    Reform, not Reformed, Judaism is fluid and over the years, the Movement has been in a constant state of flux, being true to this name. Some of our younger members have seen fit to return to traditions long regarded as out of date, while older members of our community remain Classical in their observance. I fall somewhere in between; I suppose I am a neo-Classical Reform Jew.

    As a NFTYite I thought I would be "more religious" by wearing a kippah and (sometimes) praying three times a day. When I was on EIE in high school, I started and stopped and started again to wear tzitzi'ot.  In college, I said I was just Jewish--in a post-denominational, anti-institutional kind of way. But somewhere between being a revolutionary and noticing that my revolution already had been fought and won, I re-affiliated myself with Reform Judaism.

    I worked at Greene Family Camp, where I met my fiancé, moved to New York and started working for the Movement as a Legislative Assistant for the Commission on Social Action. Much of the joy I found in leading services or teaching Jewish content came from the idea that I was helping other people connect to Judaism. God didn't play a role in this feeling for me; personally it was and is people based. So I started to ask myself: Why are you wearing a cloth around your shoulders if you don't feel a connection? Why are you covering your head with a kippah of cloth stitched together by slaves in Southeast Asia? Why are you saying words you disagree with? So I stopped doing those things, but this time I didn't start again.

    However, I still had deep connection to kashrut. For much of my life, my dad was a caterer and both of my parents would compete to make the best school lunches for my sister me. (Don't tell my dad, but my mom really nailed the turkey-to-tomato-to-lettuce-to-mustard-to-mayo ratio. She made said sandwiches on that really nice multi-grain bread, but I digress.) In my family, "soul food" is bagels, lox, white fish and chopped liver. Having said that, I love all kinds of ethnic or "soul" foods because of the passion that comes through the taste--along with the salt. Food holds a power over me and it helps me connect to people, my people. And that is why I don't have pork or shellfish in my home.

    There is a passage in the original Pittsburgh Platform that has long spoken to me. The seminal Reform document explains that we should keep the ethical commandments and "maintain only such ceremonies as elevate and sanctify our lives." As a questioning and changing Jew, there is one thing that is constant in my life and that is food. I connect to people through food. I connect to family through food. So why shouldn't I elevate the practice of eating?

    I readily acknowledge that my practice is not consistent. In pervious manifestations of my Jewish identity I would call myself a hypocrite. But these days, I call myself a neo-Classical Reform Jewish foodie.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    Bravo, dcc. I think everyone should create their own label. I call myself an Observatly Reform Litvak.

    Larry Kaufman said:

    One man's hypocrit is another man's eclectic. The Pittsburgh Platform lives, in terms of articulating that we should observe only that which elevates our lives. The trouble was that they sought to tell us what those things were.

    My life is elevated by Shabbat worship, but not by kashrut. However, food rituals are important. I was appalled once upon a time as a guest at Thanksgiving dinner when pumpkin pie was not among the dessert offerings -- even though I did not at that time eat pumpkin pie.

    I have previously identified the most salient change in Reform Judaism as our departure from identifying ourselves in terms of what we do not do. But your post, in conjunction with some of the current dialogue on the iWorship list-serv, got me thinking about the real difference between Classical and Contemporary Reform. That is the shift from the tilt towards universalism to a tilt towards particularism. Which is not to reject universalism -- after all, I care about pumpkin pie on the Thanksgiving table, as much as I care about matzo ball soup on the Pesach table.

    Yes, we care about Darfur -- but we also care about Sderot. And yes, we may not care much how (read By whom) our meat was slaughtered -- but we know that the meat coming out of the Rubashkin plant in Postville is rendered treif by the exploitation of the (Mexican)workers there.

    Again, to reinforce my univeralist credentials, let me cite not one of the Rabbis, but the famous line from Ralph Waldo Emerson (and I have just exhausted my familiarity with his oeuvre), a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. Just because there is some ritual stuff that doesn't talk to you, you don't have to consign yourself to any kind of neo-Classical Reform.

    William Berkson said:

    Donald's post, and Larry's earlier one on Talitot reflect what I call 'the great mitzvah muddle' in today's Reform Judaism. Denis Prager has joked that the three branches of Judaism are "the crazy, the hazy and the lazy." You know which is which. But in recent decades Reform has moved over toward the hazy.

    Classic reform--meaning the Pittsburgh Platform era--had a lot of shortcomings, but lack of clarity was not one of them. They knew what they believed, which seems to be no longer the case for the Reform movement. So it's our job to sort it out, here :)

    I'm going to give my take on it, soon, but I want to get post first on theology, because that's the basis of any decision on the meaning of mitzvot.

    Martin Shapiro said:

    I'd love to try Classic reform. It makes far more sense to me than being fully immersed in so many rituals and traditional observances that you might as well become conservative or orthodox.

    M. B. said:

    There is a good new web site called renewreform.org for The Society for Classical Reform Judaism that was featured in the last Reform magazine. It sounds like a vibrant group of young Jews who are in sync with the progressive American form of Judaism.

    I know a lot of people are turned off by the neo-Orthodox concentration on Old World ritual, clothing and language rather than ethical living. And many Jews prefer a Reform kosher, that is, one derived from the Bible, but without all the overlay of Orthodox "commandments" which are not found in the Bible. Personally, I'd much rather eat a free range chicken from Whole Foods or Kroger than one produced under the shocking conditions discovered at the Rubashkin Agroprocessors Plant that has a fancy Orthodox stamp on it.

    Post a comment