RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About Us | Submissions | Contact
Torah
Community
Ethics
Israel
Religious Life
Social Action
Holidays
Shabbat
Lifecycle
The Future

Ask The Rabbi

Get Jewish World News in your inbox

BOOKS & MUSIC

Inside Intermarriage
Inside Intermarriage:
A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

by Jim Keen
(URJ Press)

The Torah
The Torah: A Women's Commentary
(URJ Press)

Union for Reform Judaism

Dónde están las mujeres
July 17, 2008
Ethics | Social Action (4 comments)

By dcc  
This week the Saudi government sponsored an interfaith meeting in Madrid, Spain. Rabbi Scott Sperling, director of the Mid-Atlantic Council of the Union and representative of the Commission on Interreligious Affairs, is there for the Reform Movement. Ari Alexander, co-founder of Children of Abraham, is also attending. He is live blogging at Mixed Multitudes about the event. He was shocked to see so few female participants at the conference. In a week were where we read Parashat Pinchas, a seminal work of feminism in the Torah, his point resonates even louder for me.

It is all too easy for men to say nothing about the lack of women in a room, Alexander writes. As a young man working in a world with far more women than men, but where there are very few women in positions of power, not saying anything is not an option. We must say something when there is a clear issue of discrimination. It is also the responsibility of all involved--both those in the majority and those being discriminated against--to work against these trends.

Take a look at Alexander's post. It is worth the read.

print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

 

Comments

Larry Kaufman said:

This is a refreshing topic, given all that we've been hit with on the other side of the coin -- where are the men in synsgogue leadership, where are the boys in NFTY. Reading both dcc and Alexander tends to lend some credence to what I haven't wanted to think -- that Reform egalitarianism, creating opportunities for women, is directly responsible for the disappearance of men, or at least the diminution of their presence.

But Alexander's post raises another issue. I'm referring to the reference to women rabbis not being included, in order not to scare away the Orthodox rabbinate. I don't know the answer, but the question is real: How much do we compromize our own principles out of deference to the principles of others?

In our community, the congregations across the denominational spectrum used to gather for Yom HaShoah. One year when the Orthodox congregation vetoed having the Reform cantor -- female -- sing, the Conservative cantor -- male -- said he wouldn't sing either, and the program proceeded without music.

And is there, or should there be, a difference in the concessions we'll make to Muslims as compared to concessions we'll make to Orthodox Jews?

Joseph said:

We could also ask why the conference organizers refused to identify the Israeli Rabbi there as an Israeli. This conference is the Saudi's first attempt, so we are cutting them plenty of slack.

Dave Abbey said:

Larry's question about 'differences in concessions we'll make to Muslims as compared to concessions we'll make to Orthodox Jews'

My own view is we should not make any more concessions to anyone.. .how come we are the ones expected to compromise our principles....

Larry Kaufman said:

I'm not ready to rule out all concessions for a variety of reasons -

1. There are clearly occasions when the more flexible should yield to the less flexible -- so that I'm OK with all community dinners being Kosher, even those where many of the attendees won't care at all, and others would settle for a fish or fruit plate option. I recognize that I can eat Kosher food, but that there are those who can't eat non-Kosher food.
2. Mipnei darchei shalom -- for the sake of peace in the community
3. In support of the principle of pluralism -- our being different doesn't mean that if I'm right, you must be wrong.

But, as I have said elsewhere, I do expect some degree of reciprocity, some kind of acknowledgment from the other side that the divergent viewpoints and practices doesn't delegitimate the folks on the other side. Basically, I'll share a table with whoever will share the table with me -- but why concede anything when the whole concession will be dismissed anyway?

The bottom line, Dave, is that not all concessions require that we compromise our principles (e.g., kashrut), but a core principle like egalitarianism still gives me pause.

Post a comment