RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About Us | Submissions | Contact
Torah
Community
Ethics
Israel
Religious Life
Social Action
Holidays
Shabbat
Lifecycle
The Future

Ask The Rabbi

Get Jewish World News in your inbox

BOOKS & MUSIC

Inside Intermarriage
Inside Intermarriage:
A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

by Jim Keen
(URJ Press)

The Torah
The Torah: A Women's Commentary
(URJ Press)

Union for Reform Judaism

Kiev Revisited
August 18, 2008
Community | Religious Life | The Future (3 comments)

By Larry Kaufman
As regular readers of this blog may have noticed through my comments on other people's posts, I've recently returned from a river cruise through Ukraine -- fortunately arriving home before the Georgian crisis erupted -- and want to share some thoughts in three general areas:

  1. Differences between Jewish and secular travel
  2. The changes that appear to have taken place in Ukraine since my prior trip in 2001
  3. Ukrainian roots for American Jews
Differences between Jewish and secular travel
Our trip was organized by Alumni Holidays International, and sponsored by several university alumni associations.  Although open seating and general mingling prevailed aboard ship, our busses for shore excursions were organized by school, with passengers from less represented schools assigned arbitrarily to the busses of the dominant institutions, University of Chicago (my alma mater), Cornell, Dartmouth, Tufts, and William & Mary. Substantive content beyond that provided by very good local guides came through two lectures each from three professors, covering history, identity, and language issues. The role of the Jews is integral to talking about Ukrainian history, and was discussed both by the guides and by the academics.  My guess is that about 20% of the audience was Jewish, with the percentage probably a little higher on the University of Chicago bus.

My 2001 trip didn't focus on Ukraine, but it did start in Kiev, where this trip ended, and then went on to St. Petersburg and Moscow.  That trip was organized as a leadership mission by ARZA World Union, the short-lived combination of the Association of Reform Zionists of America and the World Union for Progressive Judaism - with the expectation that we travelers would return to the U.S. as missionaries for strengthening Progressive Judaism in the Former Soviet Union.

As might be expected, on the ARZA World Union trip, Jewish content was central, although we also got excellent coverage of key tourist sites in Kiev like the Friendship Arch, the Founders monument, and the Great Gate - but no churches.  (We did visit churches in Moscow and St. Petersburg.)  The first stop in Kiev on the Alumni trip was Babi Yar, where the local guide was open not only about the Nazi round-up but also about the Soviet effort to memorialize the tragedy without reference to Jewish victims.  As the guide was concluding the visit with an eloquent recitation of the Yevtushenko poem, I asked those of my traveling companions who wished to join me in reciting Kaddish.
 
But beyond Babi Yar, the  Jewish content in the professors' lectures and guides' commentaries was essentially peripheral, as part of discussing Ukraine's incredibly polyglot history. Nor were we shown any of the Jewish landmarks of Kiev: No Sholom Aleichem statue, no plaque marking Golda Meir's birthplace, no Brodsky synagogue.

The other contrast came in terms of creature comforts. Think dorm rooms and dorm food for the alumni trip; think four and five-star hotels when you travel with the Reform movement.  (For a trip I was thinking of organizing, the travel counselor at ARZA's favored trip arranger advised nothing less than four-star hotels - our clientele likes its luxury.)  My bottom line on this, as someone who travels three-star when I travel on my own, is that I'll go to France or Italy or the British Isles on a commercial tour, or an alumni tour, but if I'm going to places rich in Jewish history and culture, I'll choose the Jewish tour for its content, and accept the luxury as a bonus.
 
Changes in Ukraine since 2001
On our first night in Kiev in 2001, we came back to the hotel after Shabbat services at Congregation Hatikvah, and were having dinner in the glassed-in rooftop restaurant when the night skies lit up with fireworks.  It turned out we had arrived on the tenth anniversary of Ukrainian independence and the city was alive with excitement and patriotic fervor....but it was still very much a Russian city. Three years after that visit, Kiev became the rallying point for the Orange Revolution, a successful peaceful uprising with its roots in protesting election fraud, but whose outcome placed in power the faction that looks towards Europe, ousting the faction that looks towards Russia.
 
We sensed a little more prosperity on this trip, but that may have been a matter of what we were shown each time - in 2001, a Joint Distribution Committee soup kitchen, in 2008, the riverside McMansions of the Ukrainian oligarchs. The city has grown about ten percent, to three million, in these seven years, including major expansion on the other side of the river, and the years since the Orange Revolution have seen a new emphasis on tourism.  Only in Kiev, among the five Ukrainian cities we visited, did we find restaurants with English menus and with serving personnel who had a little of our language at their command.

As part of the move to identify more with Europe than with Russia, the push is on to grow the use of the Ukrainian language in preference to Russian.  Historically, Russian was more prevalent in the cities, Ukrainian in rural areas, especially in the western provinces, farther away from Russia.  Both are Slavic languages, with Ukrainian more heavily influenced by Polish and by the Russian dialect of Belarus.  Both languages are written in Cyrillic, but there are subtle differences between the Russian and Ukrainian alphabets. (As a side note, I taught myself the pronunciation of the Cyrillic letters by using a siddur that included Hebrew transliterations.)
  
Whatever growth in affluence the city may have experienced, it has not rubbed off on the Progressive congregation.  We visited Hatikvah's new home - which Rabbi Duchovny explained is half the size at twice the rent of the prior facility. Membership has been stable, which apparently is also true of the two Orthodox congregations, one Lubavitch, one not.  Kiev has an estimated one hundred thousand Jews, about the same number as before the Nazis and the Soviets - but in the pre-Nazi days that hundred thousand represented about twenty percent of the population; where today it's about three percent. The Progressive movement has a great opportunity in Ukraine, as throughout the former Soviet Union, but only if we North Americans subsidize its development.  One change that hasn't taken place in these seven years is the FSU budget of the World Union for Progressive Judaism, approximately $1.5 million compared to Chabad's $70 million.  But that's a topic for another day.

Ukrainian roots for American Jews
One of the highlights of our 2001 trip to Kiev was a visit to the residence of the U.S. ambassador, which was decorated with paintings and sculpture by American artists of Ukrainian descent like Louise Nevelson and Andy Warhol.  One thing I hadn't realized prior to seeing that art was how many artists I had thought of as Russian were actually Ukrainian.  
This shouldn't have surprised me as much as it did.  I had always thought of my paternal grandparents as coming to the U.S. from Russia - but actually they were from the outskirts of Kiev.  My mother was born in what was then Poland, but is now Belarus.  One tends to forget how fluid the borders were, as control of various territory shifted -- one day under the control of the Russians, another day of the Poles or of the Austro-Hungarian empire.
 
In fact, a story is told of the Jewish couple who were given their preference when the boundary line was being drawn between Poland and Russia - did they want to be in Russia or Poland.  When Shmuel immediately opted for Poland, Rivke pointed out that the Poles were arguably more anti-Semitic than the Russians, True, Shmuel responded, but at least if we're on the Polish side of the line, we'll be spared the rigors of the Russian winter!

Looking at the borders as they are drawn today, and as they were in Czarist times, we have to remember that  Jews could live only in the so-called Pale of Settlement, which included  much of what is today's Ukraine. Whether our individual pictures of European Jewish life are drawn from family memory or from Fiddler on the Roof or similar literary sources, we have to remember that Anatevke/Kasrilevke and the rest of Sholom Aleichem-land lay somewhere between Odessa and Kiev - subject to the Czar, but in Ukraine, not in Russia.

Virtually every couple among our Jewish compatriots on the trip included at least one spouse who talked about a parent or a grandparent who had come to America from Ukraine.  However, none mentioned adding an Everything is Illuminated excursion with a shtetl-shlepper in search of their roots. On our 2005 WUPJ trip to Poland, many of our travel companions visited the towns their ancestors had left sixty to a hundred years before.

My wife hopes eventually to visit Kamenetz-Podilsky, in western Ukraine, where her grandparents came from; our children adopted our grandson from Kharkov, in eastern Ukraine.   But I have no family nostalgia, no sense of wanting to visit Kobrin or Bershtivke, partly because my grandparents and older aunts and uncles never wanted to talk about "the old country" with its apparently painful memories.
 
So why do so many of us travel to Warsaw, Cracow, Prague, Budapest, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and especially, I ask myself, why do I keep going back?  It's more than the pull of  the traveler's desire to see something new, or to see something old for the first time.  I think maybe it's to fit a few more pieces into the jigsaw puzzle of who we are and of the forces that shaped us - and to gain an appreciation for our grandparents (or parents, or great-grandparents) who had the foresight and the courage to pull up stakes , bringing with them to America not much more than the treasure of Yiddishkeit. 

But there's also some pleasure in seeing the resurgence of Jewish life, slow though it be, in places where so many efforts were made to eradicate it.  My congregation in Evanston is Beth Emet, the house of Truth - but my congregation in Kiev is Hatikvah - the house of Hope.
 

print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

 

Comments

M. B. said:

Sounds like some very interesting travel, Larry. Did you have trouble with visas? Russia is notorious for making it difficult to get a visa (and that was before the invasion of Georgia). I understand that group tours have easier access to visas in some countries than families or individuals.

Was there much nervousness about Russian action against the more democratic and western leaning Ukraine? I am sure that the Georgian attack was intended to scare Ukraine back in line also.

Some friends from the Ukraine tell me that there is still a lot of anti-Semitism there. Did you detect any signs of it?

What options are there for helping out progressive congregations in Ukraine?

Larry Kaufman said:

In response to MB's questions:

1. Re visas, I don't remember if we needed them for Ukriane in 2001, but I know we didn't need them on this trip. And I know we needed visas for Russia in 2001, but I don't remember if we needed them when we were back in 2005. I don't recall any difficulty in getting the visas, but that was a group tour.
2. Re nervousness, we had no inkling of the imminence of the Georgian crisis, but we were made aware of tensions relating to the Russian lease for the use of the harbor in Sevastopol coming up soon for renewal, against a backdrop of Russia wanting the Crimea (now an autonomous province of Ukraine, to enhance its access to the Black Sea, and thus the Straits of Bosporus and the Meidterranean.
3. Althouigh we saw no direct signs of anti-semitisim, we have heard about it as a real problem from many of our contacts in Ukraine. As just one small indication, the progressive synagogue in Kiev is located in an alley, its sign is in Cyrillic, and does not identify it as a synagogue. On the other hand, the Jewish restaurant a block away unabashedly identifies itself as Jewish.
4. Regarding helping progressive congregations in Ukraine, the options are many. Easiest, of course, is to send money to the World Union for Progressive Judaism, earmarking it for Ukraine.
I am currently working with the FSU Department of the WUPJ and with the North American Council, and also with the World Jewry Committee of the URJ, to re-invigorate a twinning program. My congregation twins with the Progressive congregation in Simferopol (capital of the Crimea); one of the Houston congregations has been extremely supportive of the congregation in Odessa -- and I'll be glad to work with any congregation to help get a program going. The idea is to start a 2-way people-to-people relationship, which helps the North American congregation even as it helps the Ukrainian congregation. Very often these relationships begin with the North American congregation personally delivering a Torah scroll to the Ukrainian congregation. WUPJ can help identify congregations that need Torahs and that have English speakers so the congregations can communicate. Please contact me at hinneni (at) aol.com if I can be of assistance in making a shiddach (match).

Thanks for giving me this additional soap-box!

Vadym said:

Next time you visit Kiev take advantage on Kiev trip agency

Post a comment