RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Bereshit: New Beginnings
    October 25, 2008
    Jewish Living | Lifecycle | Torah (5 comments)

    By Andi Rosenthal 
    This morning, my weekly Torah study group, along with thousands of b'nei mitzvah children all over the world, began the Torah over again. The beginning comes, in my opinion, at the exact perfect moment, when the chill in the air and the gorgeous vibrant leaves and the deep azure of the Sound all bring the beauty of G-d's handiwork into sharp focus. It's as if, no matter what troubles or joys you are facing, you simply have to notice what a beautiful world we live in. And as a writer, very few narratives intrigue me as much as our sacred story of creation. Bereshit bara Elohim et hashamayim v'et ha'aretz - in the beginning, G-d created the heavens and the earth - is one of those perfect first lines - in fact, it is THE perfect first line. And I think any writer worth their keyboard would agree.

    Consider how some of the most compelling and intriguing stories begin with lines like: Scarlett O'Hara was not beautiful, but men seldom realized it when caught by her charm as the Tarleton twins were. Or, Lily, the caretaker's daughter, was literally run off her feet. The perfect combination of wanting to know more about the character and the action inherent in the text. From the moment you read it, you're hooked. Face it: you can't let the story go.

    When I think about "in the beginning" it always makes me wonder. The beginning, by definition, can only take place once. And yet in life, we are inundated by beginnings, second and third acts, countless chances. The old saw, "You never get a second chance to make a first impression" is a powerful statement, but I'm curious as to whether it is actually true. Our gift of teshuvah, of personal evolution, of the ability to turn and change, and the not-so-unimportant blessing of other people's short term memory gives us that second chance all the time.

    Just like with Torah: every year, we begin again. We rarely read it the same way twice. In each reading cycle, we are informed by internal and external circumstances, life changes, personal experience, and the opinions and ideas that other people bring to the table. The fact that we are not supposed to study alone makes that last quality perhaps the most important. Reading about the death of Miriam one year made me consider the justifiable frustration and anger of B'nei Yisrael having been "led on" through the desert, and now facing a crisis of inadequate water and supplies for the journey. A year later, having faced incalculable loss in my own life, all I could see was a distraught and grieving Moses simultaneously struggling to lead a people and mourn for his sister. That point of view had, of course, been at the table the year before - many of those teachers of Torah with whom I share in study every Shabbat had the knowledge way before I did. But it took looking at the text through my own lens of mourning to see it clearly.

    Beginning again is also the hallmark of so many aspects of my own life: by definition, the writer is always beginning, whether it is a new book, a new chapter, a new sentence. And as is the case with so many fellow Jews-by-Choice, living life in a new faith and according to a new set of lifecycles accounts for numerous beginnings throughout the learning process of becoming Jewish -- and beyond. Consider the process: taking Intro to Judaism; beginning Hebrew classes. Starting with aleph instead of the letter A. Realizing that your day now starts at sundown rather than sunrise. Even figuring out how to keep kosher (which I still haven't managed to do) or how to conduct that first Seder or bake that first Rosh HaShana apple cake calls for looking at things in a way you've never seen them before, beginning again, over and over. It is certainly no accident that many of us who have trained as URJ Outreach Fellows call our discussion group for Jews-by-Choice "New Beginnings."

    As I wrote recently, sometimes being at the beginning again can be scary. It is learning how to mark time and move forward poised between old knowledge and new, between who you've been and whom you've yet to become. Perhaps still reacting to old ghosts and ideas from the past and perhaps fearing what the future holds. It's an odd place to be.

    But as my dear friend Reb Marci taught me in our recent online discussion about the death of Moses, Torah does not really allow us to dwell in the past; the story's very momentum commands us to move forward. And before we know it we are back at the table, in awe as our eyes behold the heavens and the earth, the stars in the firmament and every living thing according to its type. And perhaps there is nothing more perfect to say than the Holy One's own words: Ki tov.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    M. B. said:

    We need less emphasis on the weekly Bible portion. Reform Bible study used to be an analytical approach to the entire Bible. Sadly, in the past few years, some temples have cut back to just a Torah study on the Orthodox model. The books of the prophets, which are the very heart of Reform Judaism, are often ignored. Proverbs, Psalms, and other books are set aside. And even the study of the five Torah books, may be reduced to a superficial review rather when approached in an Orthodox parashot [portion of the week) manner. No longer are the broad themes in the Bible looked at by considering what all parts of the Bible have to say on a particular issue like: ethics, who wrote the different parts of the Bible, our obligations as stewards to conserve the world, conduct in war, relations with non-Jews, sin and redemption, and the nature of God. In these limited Torah classes, these are no longer the type of critical analysis that is essential for Reform Jews.

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    There is no Orthodox approach and no Reform approach. There is only Torah and the study thereof.

    For once, M.B. I am so flabbergasted by your comment that I don't even know what else to say. I guess it's nice to know that some things in the universe are a constant. And one of those things is your capacity to hijack a post on this blog and use it for your own anti-everything agenda. No matter what people write about here, you manage to take it as a sign that the Reform movement is going the Sheol in a hand basket because we've all gone Ortho on you while you weren't looking.

    M. B. said:

    The Reform approach, established in the 1800's, is to use all available information (especially science, anthropology, history, and linguistics) to interpret the Holy Scriptures. Orthodox Jews are prevented from knowing or considering much of this information, because it undermines the fundamental doctrine of revealed knowledge which may not be challenged. So while Reform Jews can consider fossils, carbon dating, physics and geology in deciding what is literally true and what is metaphorical about the creation stories in Genesis, Orthodox approach is limited to accepting the story as factual and counting the generations of people listed in the Bible to determine how old the world is (which creates errors of billions of years.) No major American or European university class on the Bible would study it from an Orthodox approach which strictly limits what can be questioned and what knowledge must be ignored. We should maintain Jewish education at the high, modern level, and not return to such a narrow view that one can't see the forest for the trees. We should insist that the Bible classes should be brought as much as feasible to the same level as one would expect at Hebrew Union College for rabbis where a hard, analytical look is made and tough questions asked.

    William Berkson said:

    One of the joys of my week is the Shabbat morning Torah study here at Rodef Shalom in Falls Church, VA.

    We look at the passages we are reading through many different lenses: What the original writer intended, including evidence from modern scholarship and archeology. What the final editors or redactors wanted to be the message to our people. What the Rabbinic reading (Talmud, Midrash) of the text is. What we can learn from it today, either positively or negatively. We don't usually look at the mystics, but that would be welcome too. And the aesthetic impact of the story; its language, its emotional force.

    All these different approaches can be fascinating and enlightening.

    MB is right that Orthodox would have a different focus, but I've never heard a Reform discussion of Torah that has only an Orthodox focus--which would be from a purely Rabbinic viewpoint.

    As to studying only Torah, Torah does have a particular power, I think, and should always be central.

    I like to see study of Rabbinic works, as well as the Prophets and Writings. I know the way we have handled it at Rodef Shalom is that in Summers the study is lay-led, and not Torah in the sense of the 5 Books of Moses. Three summers ago we studied Pirkei Avot, the following one the books of Samuel, with the fascinating David story, and this past summer we continued with the books of Kings.

    M. B. said:

    William, your classes are much like some of the Bible classes I have attended. Years before the URJ ever thought of coming out with a woman's commentary, we spent many weeks examining the treatment of women in the Bible and how that impacted the life of Jewish women in society. We cover the entire Bible (which takes more than a year) and generally not in the order that the books appear. Instead, we may explore themes and topics, like creation, looking not just a Genesis, but also at other religious creation stories that were circulating at the time or prior to the time that the Bible was written and canonized, especially in the Middle East. Classes include sources in modern biblical scholarship, Jewish, Protestant and Catholic. We discuss how the various possible interpretations over time have changed and how they can offer a different view of man's relation to the Divine. While we generally have a rabbi leading the study, we also have had a number of guest speakers who include university and seminary professors, a Conservative Rabbi and Protestant preachers.

    When I see a temple which limits itself to just the Torah books, I see a value judgment that the other books of the Bible are somehow of lesser value or not worth our reading and studying. For a denomination who used to take great pride in being called Ethical Judaism or Prophetic Judaism, that seems totally inexplicable.

    Post a comment