RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Control
    October 20, 2008
    Ethics | Jewish Living (4 comments)

    By dcc
    Tamar Fox at Mixed Multitudes writes about Y-Love's finding that there are "activists" in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Williamsburg who are destroying advertisements because the food pictured in these billboards is "excessive and indulgent." These ultra-Orthodox food-pleasure police are defacing property of surrounding businesses because they think photographs of food that is just too tasty will distract people and lead them into a life of crime, mischief and non-Jewish activity. Stop me anytime now, but isn't vandalism criminal, mischievous and non-Jewish?

    Outside of the somewhat backwards tactics of resistance, why can't the ultra-Orthodox practice restraint and control?

    I suppose this gets at the core of my misunderstanding with a large segment of this particular part of our community. As a Reform Jew I must make choices every day about who I am, what I believe and what I will do to represent the Jewish community. A vast majority of the ultra-Orthodox community never makes a choice when it comes to these aspects of life. I have to control my impulses and desires every day. I must not steal from my neighbor, I need to conserve energy, I cannot forget my heritage and so on. Why then do these radical segments of society need to build up such ridiculous rules that make it impossible for individuals to be responsible for their own actions?

    If a person is keeping kosher for any reason, let it be by choice or the feeling that they are commanded by God, why would a picture push them to not keep kosher? If a picture of food is too excessive or indulgent, wouldn't a pious, righteous Jew not partake in such food? Why must it be assumed that a woman is so sexually interesting that a man could not see her while praying and still be able to devout his energy to the prayer? I will respect the differences in opinion that say it is tradition to do such things, but if Judaism is a religion of actions (and inaction in some cases) why can't we be trusted to act (or not act)?

    These culinary-control-czars not only make Judaism inaccessible to a vast majority of modern day Jews, they cause those within their own segment of the community to become numb to the idea of choice and responsibility.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    M. B. said:

    Bulls eye! Their right to practice their religion doesn't give them a license to vandalize the property of others, or to dictate how others can live.

    Ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel this month attacked a car driven on the Sabbath. The driver wasn't ultra-Orthodox, or Modern Orthodox, or even Jewish at all. He was a Muslim. As a result of the intolerance, people were injured, homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and relations between Jewish and Arab Israelis damaged.

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    The following is a pre-emptive follow-up comment that I know M.B. immediately will consider writing upon reading Donnie's excellent post.

    Notice, M.B., how careful Donnie is to refer only to the ultra-orthodox and notice that Y-Love himself is a black orthodox rapper. That is to say, once again, that Orthodoxy is not monolithic.

    Having dispensed with M.B.'s future hijacking of this thread early, we can move on with any real comments people may have.

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    Drats. I've been foiled. My comment appeared second. Not only that, but I think our comments have finally gotten through to M.B. For the first time, M.B. has acknowledged in a comment that there is more to Orthodoxy than Ultra-Orthodoxy.

    Larry Kaufman said:

    dcc said:
    These culinary-control-czars not only make Judaism inaccessible to a vast majority of modern day Jews, they cause those within their own segment of the community to become numb to the idea of choice and responsibility

    Although I'm sympathetic to the thrust of your post condemning vandalism masquerading as zealotry, I don't agree with either of the two conclusions articulated.

    First,the charedi lifestyle, even without this kind of misbehavior,doesn't impact the accessibility of less cultic forms of Judaism. Anyone who opts out of Judaism citing this as the reason was already looking for an excuse, and when you're looking for an excuse, one is as good as another.

    Second, the members of this community have already opted for a responsibility only to do the bidding of their rebbe as their authoritative God-surrogate. It doesn't take this sanctioned vandalism to render them numb -- they were already there.

    The thing that upsets me the most vis a vis the ultra-Orthodox is not their behavior -- it's the Jews who self-identify with other movements but who credit the Black Hats with being the preservers of Judaism.

    If there is any kind of system of divine reward and punishment as meted out by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the laugh will be on them -- because where they think they are earning credits towards their share in the World to Come, I have to believe they are actually earning debits.

    Post a comment