RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Prostration II
    October 10, 2008
    Holidays | Jewish Living (4 comments)

    By David A.M. Wilensky
    (First published on The Reform Shuckle)

    I've posted about prostration before.

    Some of the more chazanishly demanding parts of the Yom Kipur liturgy at Chavurat Lamdeinu were tackled this year by one of our members, a guy named Steve. Steve grew up in the Conservative movement and later studied super-amazing-loud-operatic chazanut in a yeshiva. He later served for many years as a chazan at a conservative synagogue here in New Jersey.

    Of course, I know that during a particular Aleinu on Yom Kipur, we're supposed to prostrate ourselves. But after years of a Reform synagogue on Austin, HUC in Jerusalem, and, last year, a Reform synagogue in New Brunswick, I've never seen it done. When Steve prostrated himself before the Ark yesterday, I was totally struck by it. The most striking thing to me about Yom Kipur this year was Steve's prostration.

    I know we Reform Jews lost this practice while pretending to be protestants in the nineteenth century, but are we really after that look anymore? Let's get back to prostration!

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    M. B. said:

    Muslims prostrate themselves daily in their worship and wear kipas. Some old Catholic practices included prostration. Reform Jews decided prostration is archaic, like the kipas the Muslims and Orthodox wear, and detracts from worship. We and a number of Protestant denominations dropped the practice of routinely kneeling in church like the Catholics and Russian Orthodox do.

    Prostration. Talk about something that is seen as offensive or silly to most educated people in Western culture!

    Another cast off practice which some have tried to introduce into Reform temples recently is the Torah parade around the sanctuary, during which people who cannot actually read the Torah fondle and kiss the cover or kiss something which they touch the cover with. That is way too close to idolatry to me! The Torah is a sacred book which is meant to be read and studied and discussed and followed by all. It is the message, not the form, which is sacred to Jews. Today, we reprint the Torah including translations in all the languages which Jews speak around the world so that it can be read and understood directly. In medieval times, a book was worth about the same amount as a farm. Now, the Torah can be reproduced for a couple of bucks on paper or downloaded for nothing on your computer. We can highlight it, underline it, annotate it, footnote it, and cut and paste it to help understand it. But we should never turn it into an idol to be paraded around and worshiped.

    Larry Kaufman said:

    Back in the day, before Reform discovered RH II, I used to go for the second day to the Conservative congregation where my wife taught in the day school, a congregation by the way that had many affinities with the Conservative congregation where I grew up. I never got used to the prostration bit, which I had never seen before -- and which helped move me to a Reform second day when it became available.

    So please don't say, "we're supposed to prostrate ourselves." We're supposed to repent and return -- and if at some congregations that means incorporating this ritual of repentance, that's their privilege.

    Given the many ways the Conservative congregations of 60 years ago acted Reform, I also grew up without body language in worship, with rabbis in robes, and even with God is in His Holy Temple.

    I have the impression that as we have brought more of an old-world flavor into our Reform services, the Conservative movement has done so as well -- I've heard some suggest that this has been a reaction to our change, as they have sought to maintain differentiation. My guess is that the reality is that both movements are reacting in their own terms to an external pressure of some kind, and not to one another.

    Something else I observed at Yom Kippur services was a scattering of gym shoes, not as a fashion statement nor in direct support of PETA but in compliance with the not wearing leather on YK tradition. Actually, I should have been wearing sneakers to cater to a broken bone in my foot, but accepted a little discomfort to avoid giving the impression that I was being frummer-than-thou.

    So, David, I leave you with this question: When Steve was down on the floor, what did he have on his feet?

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    Larry, insightful as always. I don't recall what Steve had on his feet, unfortunately.

    M.B., I don't know where this complaint about the Sefer Torah came from, but although I have some reservations about the practice of doing a hakafah, I'm generally okay with it. There's a difference between extreme reverence and worship and we certainly don't worship the Sefer Torah.

    You said, "Reform Jews decided prostration is archaic, like the kipas the Muslims and Orthodox wear, and detracts from worship." Did we? All of us? I'm a Reform Jew and I don't recall being consulted on this one.

    The thrust of my rhetorical questions here is to point out the absurdity of your claim that we've come to any complete conclusions about ritual in our movement.

    As a Classical Reform Jew, you of all people should be zealous for the seperation between ethics and rituals. And under Classical Reform, ritual choices are autonomous decisions to be made by individual Reformers. Therefore, I'd appreciate it if you'd quite telling us what Reform Jews all do, ritually speaking.

    But really boils my blood in your comment on this post, M.B., is the following: "Prostration. Talk about something that is seen as offensive or silly to most educated people in Western culture!"

    Wrong you are. I don't see how it can be seen as offensive, first of all, unless you're referring to how Islamic it looks and find offense in that appearance.

    In fact, I would argue that to modern, educated, western people, things that appear foreign or "ethnic" do not appear offensive or silly. I hate to throw around grandiose declarations, but that's the type of Western superiority thinking that leads to the destruction of indigenous cultures!

    And anyway, I'm both western and educated and I don't find prostration silly or offensive. I find it fascinating and powerful.

    I'm certain this was not your intent in this comment, M.B., but you come across as a bigot here.

    David A.M. Wilensky said:

    And M.B., by the way, Muslims don't wear kipot for the same reasons Jews do. Many middle eastern Muslims cover their heads because of a simple cultural modesty thing. It's just polite in many middle eastern cultures to cover your head.

    Post a comment