RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About Us | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    VaYetsei -- Did Someone Edit Your Torah?
    December 4, 2008
    Torah (10 comments)

    By Marge Eiseman
    I have been dwelling in Parashat VaYetsei this week, in preparation for leading a D'var Torah at the Harry & Rose Samson JCC in Milwaukee on Wednesday night. I read through it, line by line, and when I got to the end, I realized that by now, with years of Torah study under my belt, I had already read and "knew" every single part of the story.

    I knew about Jacob leaving Beer-Sheva traveling towards Harran, and resting for the night in the certain place -- HaMakom. I knew he put his head on a stone pillow and dreamt the dream of angels ascending and descending a ladder to heaven. I remembered the promise that God made to him in that dream, and what he said on awakening.

    I knew that he turned the pillow into a pillar, and named the place Beth El (but others called it Luz), and he journeyed on to encounter shepherds near a well covered by a stone. And then he met Rachel, watered her flocks, kissed her and met the rest of the family. I knew Laban would make him work for seven years to marry his daughter Rachel, only to trick him into marrying Leah, because in his country, the older has to marry before the younger. And finally, I was staring at the text, reading and rereading the same line. I thought he had to work another seven years for the right to marry Rachel. I'm sure of it.

    But no! Laban only asks him to complete the bridal week with Leah, and then he can have Rachel; afterwards he'll be working the next seven years for the wife he is already enjoying!

    Does this happen to any of you? Someone goes in and edits every single version of Torah so that what you thought you knew is in fact wrong?

    I went around all week, asking people what they thought the real story was, and no one got it right. I asked young people who attend(ed) day schools, and Jewish educators, and generally knowledgeable Jews -- I gave them every benefit, encouraged them to think together and fill in the details for each other. Everyone eventually gave me the version of "work, marry (get tricked), work and marry the right one..."

    Why would we all be wrong? I think there something in the story that makes us so uncomfortable that we have to change it. On the surface, it's distasteful, setting up a man to sleep with two sisters. We don't have any stories of other patriarchs with multiple wives, so it doesn't seem "normal". At best, we can compartmentalize to think of Jacob having a wife he bears children with, and a wife he loves, and then two other wives (Bilhah and Zilpah) who provide some diverse pleasure...and nowadays, we'd want Jacob to find all these aspects in one wife.

    I don't know yet where all this leads, or how it relates to my life. But I do know this: I don't like being wrong! I'm going back to the source and reading Torah even more carefully from now on.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Leone Baum said:

    For the past eleven years twenty or more of us have studied Torah for one hour at 9AM on Saturday morning.

    Rather than finding the text repetitious, we continue to make joyful discoveries such as the fact that Jacob did not have to wait seven more years but actually got Rachel on credit, enjoyment now and pay later.

    No wonder we are still reading the Torah after so many years - unedited and unchanged.

    Rabbi Jeffrey Astrachan said:

    Looking forward to sharing these "new" insights with my Torah study group tomorrow morning. There really IS something new in Torah every time we read the text...but have to remember to actually READ the text.

    Thanks for this! and Shabbat Shalom...

    Jeff

    M. B. said:

    Regardless of the details, the problems is that Jacob was cheated out of seven (7) years of his life by his own uncle, Laban and he was saddled with a less desireable second wife that Laban palmed off on him. Laban was a crook and Jacob was so weak a patsy that he let himself be hoodwinked out of the prime of his life. If he had any guts at all, he would have beaten Laban half to death, left the x-virgin Leah (who was in on the con game) for Laban to worry about, and taken the beautiful Rachel away. Instead he stayed with his conniving uncle, allowing himself to be the doormat of the family. He would never have amounted to anything without God looking after him later on.

    Jacob could dream of wrestling with an angel, but his courage evaporated when he awoke.

    Larry Kaufman said:

    Marge, you have just offered major support for one of my favorite maxims -- you don't get in trouble from the things you don't know; it's the things you know for sure that aren't true.

    So now we have to take a fresh look at Laban, in the knowledge that he didn't make Jacob wait 14 years for Rachel, only seven years and one week. Was he doing tshuvah for his trickery by letting Jacob work out the additional seven years after getting the prize?

    Our usual Torah study serves to remind us that our revered ancestors were flawed human beings. So now we are reminded that even the traditional bad guys have redeeming characteristics.

    So now let me challenge the rj.org kahal to find more examples of the things we all know for sure, that are wrong!

    penk said:

    Our bat mitzvah this Shabbat unwittingly lit upon an interesting cultural reference for this week's parashah: 2 women spend their lives fighting over the same man - sounds just like half the CW shows that our young teens are watching each day.

    But just a comment on M.B.'s feedback.

    A little harsh, no? And once again, we get to beat up on Leah? How many of us wake up in the middle of the night with an insight on how to make the world right - and then completely fail to do that thing when we're awake? Seems to me that one of the reasons Jacob is us (and we are Yisrael) is exactly because he is so flawed, so complicated and ultimately so dependent on God for figuring out what is and how to do the right thing.

    M.B. wrote:

    Jacob could dream of wrestling with an angel, but his courage evaporated when he awoke.

    M. B. said:

    Perk, some of us try to justify whatever was done by our ancestors, but I think that's missing the point. My comments on Jacob, Leah and Laban are harsh. I see a lot of the stories in the Bible as negative examples, warnings of what not to do and examples of falling short. Many characters in our family history are deeply flawed and many just plain rotten. No one is perfect. That includes our kings and queens, high priests, patriarchs and matriarchs, and common people. It's only God that we can assume is acting always for the good, even when we mortals cannot comprehend His motivation.

    Rich in MN said:

    What we transmit orally differs from the text. The first time I read through the Torah for myself I remember thinking, "well, that's not what I remeber from Hebrew School." We embellish, we sometimes fail to distinguish between the text and the midrash, and I think, in this case, the salient point is that he had to work fourteen years instead of seven for the wife he wanted, so we overlook that he got her at the seven year point. I also wonder if seeing Jacob get Rachel at the seven year point leaves us confused as to why, having got what he wanted, Jacob - whom we are accustomed to thinking of as the trickster - doesn't just leave. That he treats Laban with absolute integrity (even if Rachel does not) messes a bit with our image of him, and so we suppose that he got Rachel at the end of the term instead of at the beginning.

    Dan in TX. said:

    A small curve ball. Is it not the tradition that the oldest girl is to marry first. If not she is marked to be an "old maid" sort of speak. Is it possible that, 1. Rachel might have been the one to approach her father and sacrifice herself and give Leah to Jacob not to "curse" her sister, or 2. Laban approached Rachel with the same issue.
    I am amazed at how much more truth is being opened up the more "we" read the scriptures and not listen to a Torah portion or just one Rabbi's opinion. I have heard so many different angle to scripture and many times nothing settles with me until 1. I read it for myself over and over or 2. One time I hear it through a teaching and the light finally comes on.

    Shalom...
    Dan

    M. B. said:

    On further review, I recognized that I failed to factor in that this episode of the Bible took place hundreds of years before the Ten Commandments and long before the prophets changed everything. These primitive people were not living in a culture which had the same fundamental laws and moral guidelines that we do in Reform Judaism, including basic rules of honesty and fair dealing. So Laban could demur to a complaint that he cheated his nephew and Leah to a complaint that she conspired to defraud the man she married. If there are no rules, anything goes. It's whatever you can get away with (outside the Noahide laws).

    Chaim said:

    Hi Marge:

    Are you using the Modern Commentary Rev. Edition?The commentary in the Torah: A Modern Commentary Rev. Ed. states this additional 7-year term usually means the 7 day bridal week, but that Jacob did in fact serve another 7 years. Jacob must first serve seven more years before he can marry Rachel, however Rashi and Ibn Ezra understand Laban to stipulate that Jacob wait out 'this bridal week' and then marry Rachel, thus obtaining her 'on credit' and paying it off in seven yearly installments. So he worked 7 years, waited the 7 day bridal week, married Rachel, then worked another 7 years to 'pay it off on credit' so to speak.

    Post a comment