RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Confronting Our Demagogue
    February 19, 2009
    By Rabbi Eric Yoffie | Israel (15 comments)

    by Rabbi Eric Yoffie
    (Originally published in
    The Forward and Ten Minutes of Torah)
    tmt-bug.jpgThe apologists and the excuse-makers in the American Jewish community have begun their work. No need for concern, they say. Avigdor Lieberman, leader of Israel's Yisrael Beiteinu party, is not really an extremist. He may have some unconventional ideas and have said some unfortunate things, but he is basically a mainstream politician who poses no threat to U.S.-Israel relations or to relations between Israel and American Jews.

    Much of the debate until now has focused on whether or not Lieberman can be accurately classified as a racist or a fascist. But this debate is largely beside the point. A far-right politician on the European model, he has risen to prominence at a time of uncertainty and fear by alleging that Israel faces a threat from within. Like other demagogues of this type, he has been sly in his rhetoric so that allegations of racism cannot be established with certainty.

    Nonetheless, the thrust of his campaign was anything but ambiguous. His intention was to inflame hatred of Arab Israelis among the Jewish Israeli public. His major policy proposal was a loyalty oath clearly intended to disenfranchise Israel's Arab citizens and turn them into residents without rights. It was an outrageous, abominable, hate-filled campaign, brimming with incitement that, if left unchecked, could lead Israel to the gates of hell.

    The challenges posed by the relationship between the Jewish state and its Arab citizens are certainly real. Demagogues thrive by focusing on real issues. It is legitimate to be concerned about the distancing of Arab Israelis from the Jewish state and about ensuring a Jewish majority in Israel. But no one in his or her right mind believes that these problems will be solved by rescinding the Israeli citizenship of more than a million Arabs.

    American Jews -- the vast majority of whom are strong supporters of Israel as both a Jewish and a democratic state -- are dismayed by Lieberman, mostly because he represents values that we abhor. Furthermore, we know that America's commitment to Israel rests far more on shared values than on strategic interests, and thus we see him as a threat to the U.S.-Israel alliance. In addition, there is reason to worry that he will blacken Israel's name among the democratic nations of the world.

    It would, of course, be a mistake to obsess about Lieberman and to grant him greater importance than he deserves. Remember that he received only about 12% of the vote, much of it a protest against the perceived weakness of the other major-party leaders. And, it's safe to say, most Israelis find his views utterly unacceptable. Still, Israel's bizarre parliamentary politics could elevate him to a position of real power. What is important, therefore, is for all concerned to do what is necessary to limit his influence and visibility.

    If the party forming the next government can keep Lieberman out of the coalition, it should; if not, he should be exiled to the margins of the government, and it should be made clear at every opportunity that he does not speak for Israel.

    But American Jewish leaders, too, face a significant test. For all those who claim to speak and lobby on our behalf, who fight antisemitism whenever it appears, and who champion Jewish rights everywhere, this is a moment of truth. If we are silent or speak the language of equivocation, we will weaken rather than strengthen Israel's cause. We will also undermine our credibility with our government and with American Jews, who are looking to us for leadership. We do not make excuses for the haters, the bigots and the demagogues who incite against Jews and other minorities around the world, and we must not make excuses when the inciter is one of our own.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    S. Preston Duncan said:

    Well spoken. I went on a birthright trip about a year ago, came back in love with Israel, and terrified by the noticeable influence of ethnocentricity in public opinion. Isaac and Ishmael. Yitzchak and Ismail.

    Cantor Gregory Yaroslow said:

    All the more reason to support the work of J Street & the Shalom Center.

    Peter said:

    This column by Yoffie is illuminating. It reveals that the opponents of Lieberman lack arguments against his proposals and can only resort to demonization and name-callling.

    Yoffie utterly and completely fails to grapple with the reasons for Lieberman's proposals to require loyalty for citizenship; to wit, that there are a substantial percentage of Arabs with Israeli citizenship who support Hamas and seek the destruction of the Jewish nation. Yoffie's only tactic is a feeble attempt at marginalization, and hurling insults.

    To follow Yoffie, is for Jews to walk blindly towards their own destruction. Yoffie tries to make Lieberman's views about eliminating a fifth column beyond the pale, but it is Yoffie's unsupported demonization and ostrich-like refusal to deal with reality that is beyond the pale.

    Ephraim Rubinger said:

    Rabbi Yofee's virulent attack upon Avigdor Lieberman is unfair. He claims that Lieberman represents values that "we abhore" but he fails to spell out exactly what those values are. He admits that it is rather difficult to call Lieberman a racist but that is only because Liebrman is "sly". In other words be opposed to Lieberman not on the basis of what he says and does, but simply because he is right wing.

    The purpose of Israel is to be a Jewish state and a democratic state. The word "democratic" is not a codeword for committing suicide. There is a real problem: Israel has a growing minority of Arabs, many of whom look forward to the demise of Israel. There has been an increase in terror attacks from this quarter. Arab Knesset members openly side with terrorists such as Hizbollah and Hamas.An Arab Knesset member was caught giving Hizbollah information regarding Israeli military positions.

    You cannot have a democracy where an entire group of people are oppossed to the very existence of the state in which they are living. Again,"democracy" does not mean suicide.

    The term "loyalty oath" for many of us has an ugly sound to it. It reminds us of those terrible McCarthy days when loyal American citizens were asked to take a loylaty oath on the basis of membership in some organization or perhaps just a friendship with someone who Senator McCarthy did not approve of. This is not the case with the issue at hand. We are talking about outright expressions and actions of disloyalty from members of a community that is rapidly growing.

    Perhaps Avigdor Lieberman is wrong. Maybe a "loyalty oath" is not the best way of solving this problem. Perhaps the term is so odious that it will offset any gain it might bring. That is a rational and reasonable concern. Howver it is no less rational or reasonable to be concerned about the future Jewish integrity of the State of Israel, To dub those who are so concerned as somehow being "haters, bigots and demagogues", ah, now that is the REAL demogoguery.

    I pray that Rabbi Yofee not fall victim of becoming what he accuses others of being.

    Sarah Altman said:

    Rabbi Yoffie is RIGHT!

    Mariellen Spiro said:

    This is a crossroads for a much deeper philosophical discussion: Can Israel be a "Jewish state" AND be a democracy? I am hoping someone much wiser than myself can point out how this might be accomplished because I have ambiguous feelings as I consider this.
    I am the child and grandchild of ardent Zionists. I desperately want a safe haven for my people. I am an American and strongly committed to the principles of democracy so wonderfully pointed to by the Constitution. I know that the U.S. falls short of its own espoused ideals. I hope that Israel can somehow be bettter at it than we have been. But the U.S. at least officially has no particular religion. Israel does. How can that work?

    Laura P said:

    It is a difficult question: how can Israel be a Jewish state with equal rights for all and also a democracy. Answer: eventually it will have to choose. While I ardently disagree with Lieberman, at least he is being honest about that particular point. While I absolutely support Israel's right to defend itself from Hamas rockets and terrorist attacks, as an American who loves the idea of democracy and hates racism and discrimination, Israel's internal politics are becoming cringeworthy. But I recognize that it is easy to be a critic in the USA. My life doesn't depend on keeping the tide of millions of virulently anti-Semitic neighbors who espouse my death at bay. So I can be idealistic.
    Still, I see no way that this cynical realpolitik can lead to any sort of permanent peace & security for Israel.
    All I can do, as a diaspora Jew, is wring my hands and hope for the best...and step back from the decades long habit of equating Judaism & Zionism. If Israel's internal actions and politics alienate me, I am under no obligation to support a state that kowtows to fascists and religious idealogues.
    Sadly, I don't think Israel & its neighbors will find common ground in time to avert a horrible tragedy this century. All I can do is pray for all innocent human life and keep as far away from the situation as I can.

    Frank Miller said:

    Once again I am grateful for and immensely impressed by Rabbi Yofee's bravery to speak out in this manner and register disagreement with extremist points of view. I only wish there had been more speaking out during the Bush years in the USA.

    Andy Bradtke said:

    I don't know if Avigdor Lieberman is a racist or not. But this does speak to a greater issue. I believe that any policy that further distances Israel and her Jewish citizens from "reasonable" Arabs is a mistake.

    If Israel is to survive as a nation she must continue to take the "high road" and remain a beacon of democracy and compassion for all people.

    M. B. said:

    Israel depends on US support to be a viable country. The United States will not back a country which is claims to be democratic, but denies equality and basic human rights, including freedom of religion. Even in the Jewish community only a few could stomach such a policy as Lieberman's Yisrael Beiteinu advocates. So in a very real sense, Yisrael Beiteinu must be firmly rejected in order to preserve the special protective relationship upon which Israel depends.

    Jews have been a majority in Israel in the first 60 years. During that time, Israel has had the opportunity to win the hearts and minds of the non-Jews, including the indigenous Arab population. Much of that opportunity has been squandered. Unless Israel can fully integrate non-Jews into Israeli society, assuring them of equal opportunity and genuine freedom, it is only natural that the non-Jews will chafe as second class citizens under Israeli rule (just as Jews hated being denied freedoms under Christian rulers in old Europe. When non-Jews become the majority, as they likely will within a few decades, Jews will no longer be able to impose discriminatory and repressive policies on non-Jewish Israelis. Either they will have made the country into a society with freedom and opportunity for all or they will suffer at the hands of the resentful majority who they long repressed.

    Helaine said:

    Thank you Rabbie Yoffie. We must speak out against hate and race baiting whenever and wherever it occurs. Love for Israel does not preclude standing up for what ones believes and hate is never a path to peace.

    Joseph said:

    "The United States will not back a country which is claims to be democratic, but denies equality and basic human rights, including freedom of religion."

    I'm not so sure of that, M.B. After all, the US gives over a billion a year in foreign aid to Egypt alone.

    Joseph said:

    Israel Beytenu's call for a loyalty pleadge rubs me the wrong way, but then again, I also refused to say the pledge of allegiance in high school. I think people's hearts should be directed toward their neighbors, not the state. Still, I think the left is just freaking out about losing power and hurling accusations of biggotry as a result.

    Israel Beytenu rose to power not through demagogy, but through concern for converts. Kadima promised last year to allow civil marriages, but never followed through. Israel Beytenu formed to address this issue. They promised to allow civil marriages and more accessible conversion, which attracted much support from Israeli Jews with mixed religious heritage. Liberman made this a priority after the election. He conditioned joining a Kadima lead government on support for civil marriage and more conversion, but he didn't make a loyalty oath part of the agreement. Obviously, his main concern is helping Jews with mixed backgrounds. The left got upset by Kadima's willingness to work with Israel Beytenu and refused to join any Kadima lead government. This shows that the left cares little about Jews with mixed lineages.

    If you have objections to specific Israel Beytenu policies, by all means bring them up for debate. However, spare us the sweeping accussations. They only further politics, not principles.

    Claire Gorfinkel said:

    I wish that Rabbi Yoffie had brought this thoughtful perspective to his comments on the recent invasion of Gaza. While we love the people of Israel, it is becoming increasingly difficult to support the government and its policies, which seem to be making the prospect of peace ever more unlikely. To paraphrase Cantor Yaroslow,
    all the more reason to support Brit Tzedek v'Shalom and J Street!

    John Winston said:

    I agree with Rabbi Yoffie. My late father would also have agreed with him. he was a member of the board of the Anti Defamation league in Wisconsin and a friend of Bewnjamin Epstein who was a co-chairman of the ADL and the author of "Some of My Best Friends. " I think he would have been horrified at the reaction of Abraham Foxman, the current chairman of this organization who approves of Lieberman's statements.

    Post a comment