RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Galilee Diary: Changing channels
    February 9, 2009
    Israel (3 comments)

    by Marc Rosenstein
    (Originally published in Galilee Diary and Ten Minutes of Torah)


    Happy is the man who has not followed the counsel of the wicked, or taken the path of sinners, or joined the company of the inane. -Psalm 1:1
    tmt-bug.jpg

    We do not go to the stadium because it is the "company of the inane;" Rabbi Nathan permits [attending the gladiatorial contests] in order to shout and save a life - or in order to bear witness [to the death of a Jewish gladiator] and thus release the widow to remarry. The sages taught: We don't go to theaters and circuses... If there is idol worship there, we don' t attend because of that; if not, then we don't attend because it is the "company of the inane." -Babylonian Talmud, Avodah Zarah 18b

    Last week I was asked to teach an internet in-service session for "Jewish Roots" teachers in ORT schools, on the topic of "Reality TV and Jewish Identity." At first I thought, "Right, how about the elephant and the Jewish question?" But then I understood that the request was based on two concerns - how to make Jewish text study relevant to the students' lives - and the teachers' concern with the moral values or lack thereof in the popular culture of their students.

    First of all, it's important to point out that while Israel now has satellite TV, and even without it, quite a few channels available to everyone, it is still a small country, in which a seemingly trivial cultural fad can seem to totally saturate the national consciousness. I remember when there was only one television channel, you could walk down the street on a summer evening and set your watch according to the theme song from Dallas, coming out of every window. We've come a long way since then, but when a reality show has a significant "event" (e.g., deciding who to remove from the island, or the vote on "A Star is Born"), you can't schedule a meeting or a school program that evening. And even if you don't watch, it will be on the front page of the mass circulation tabloids.

    Before reality shows, the youth entertainment fad here was the South American "telenovella" serials. There's always something. Indeed, already in 1912 the historian Joseph Klausner published an attack on the shallowness and ignorance of Israeli youth. When I came on EIE in 1962, I was taken aback to discover that my classmates were obsessed with Paul Anka, not with authentic Hebrew music. But wait, perhaps this isn't a modern phenomenon at all - look at the Talmudic discussion above, of Jewish attendance at the theater. It seems that while there were some rabbis who found a moral defense for participating in pop culture, the dominant attitude seems to have been "Jews shouldn't go there" (which implies, presumably, that they were going). The question is, what is the level of prohibition - is participating in pop culture merely an unseemly waste of time and dulling of the senses and the intellect - or is it idolatry? Is it just silly - or is it evil? Is it valueless - or does it represent negative values? Does the integration of Israel into global culture - manifest in the production of a full program of reality shows in Hebrew - represent a success of Zionism, or a failure? Should we be pleased to have taken our place among the nations - or disappointed that we couldn't do better? Would Eliezer ben Yehuda, the reviver of the Hebrew language, be proud of what we are using it for, or ashamed? And is it even legitimate to attempt a moral judgment of culture? Isn't culture whatever the people create for themselves?

    It seems that these are questions we've been asking for centuries. You might think that they would only be the concern of Jews living as a minority in the Diaspora - but it turns out that cultural influences doesn't stop at the border of the holy land - not in Roman times, not today.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Linda Levine said:

    Marc Rosenstein raises an interesting but perhaps un-answerable question when he asks if culture isn’t just what people invent for themselves. The ‘yes’ answer is simplistic in the light of all the subcultures that exist within each culture. The ‘no’ answer implies that there are many complex influences that allow a particular culture to be in a state of flux, some of them random, some engineered. The study of culture is fascinating because of this complexity. Viewing it in Israel adds many more layers of historical influence and most importantly, religious teachings and a faith-based commitment that pervades daily existence for many. I really enjoy Marc Rosenstein’s weekly commentary and the questions he raises that connect the past to the present… my past to my present far from the Galilee.

    William Berkson said:

    Interesting. However, isn't "leitzim" stronger than "inane"? It is usually translated as "mocker" or "scorner". In other words, it isn't just silliness that is a problem, it's entertainment that degrades or insults. Now I would put a lot of reality TV in that category, but I think it's important to indicate that having fun is not prohibited by Judaism!

    The important thing here is that a lot of popular entertainment does go over the line, and I think we should be forthright about criticizing it. As a number of people have put it to me, Judaism is now often "countercultural', against the prevailing norms in popular culture. So to advance Jewish values means in some cases to criticize and reject the popular culture.

    Carol Martin said:

    The contrast between the passive and active spectator in the Avodah Zarah is important for understanding our relationship to popular entertainment. We can 'shout' to save a Jewish life, witness a Jewish death to release a widow for marraige, but should not (passively) be in the company of the inane. What the writer could not have imagined in his time is another form of participation. Jewish people can be the authors, producers and performers of the spectacle. Neither could he imagine that the secular spectacle could be an argument for our best moral consciousness and historical perspective.

    Post a comment