RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Why I Am Fasting for Darfur
    June 16, 2009
    Social Action (5 comments)

    by Rabbi David Saperstein
    (Originally posted on the
    RACBlog)

    Today I find myself once again fasting for Darfur. My first fast for Darfur, which I did only a few days after being arrested with Representative John Lewis, four other members of Congress, and leaders of Darfur advocacy groups, was undertaken to underline the urgency of the suffering in the internally displaced persons camps in Darfur after President Bashir had expelled over a dozen aid groups from the region.

    Now, though, three months later, as I take up the same fast again, the situation has not materially improved. Aid groups report that while they have covered some gaps, their efforts are neither sustainable nor sufficient. Food and other supplies have been unable to be pre-positioned before the rainy season in necessary amounts. Aid groups report that hunger and water-borne diseases will spread in the rainy season, with feared results of mass migration. Children are disproportionately susceptible to the results of insufficient sanitation, food and medical supplies. Families in other parts of Sudan also suffer as aid groups were pushed out.

    All this while our hopes for a lasting peace in Sudan also dwindle, as reports of clashes in South Sudan has raised death rates to levels even higher than that of Darfur.

    On my last day of fasting, I am honored that rabbis from around the world will join in the fast. Fasting is a traditional part of Judaism, usually accompanying the memory of a great tragedy or deep repentance. But we cannot let this fast be a yearly activity, as our traditional fasts are. If that is the case, it will mean the world will have allowed the children of Darfur to slowly die, not the quick deaths at the hands of the Janjaweed, but slow deaths of hunger and disease, while promises and negotiations fail to return life-saving aid to these displaced people. Let us do everything possible to ensure that this will be the last fast necessary to draw attention to the urgent need for both relief and long-lasting peace for the people of Sudan.

    Together, activists around the world have committed to continuously pounding the drumbeat for Darfur, and Special Envoy Gration is working hard to negotiate a restoration of the humanitarian aid and to restart a just peace process and recent reports are that he is making progress in his negotiations. Yet they have still not been able to stop the suffering that is at once urgent and slow-moving. Negotiations about returning aid groups have not yet achieved real results. So, the stomachs of one group of our nation's moral leaders will be hungering this Thursday to draw attention to people who are dying - urging the restoration of aid to the people of Sudan.

    Rabbis who wish to join the last day of Rabbi Saperstein's fast on Thursday, June 18, can RSVP here.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    M. B. said:

    Darfur demonstrates Jews level of commitment to stop genocide. There have been countless speeches and articles written by Jews about what others should have done to stop the Nazi genocide and condemning the world for not taking concrete, timely, effective action to save our people. But the real world examples like Cambodia, Rwanda and Darfur shed light on whether Jews are willing to do more than talk when it comes to the genocide of others. Talk is cheap. Fasting and prayer have value, but only as a starting point. The real test is whether one is willing to put one's life on the line for the sake of a stranger. How many Jews have volunteered to actually fight to save the persecuted people suffering and dying? Not verbal "fighting," protests or demonstrations, in the comfort and safety of your own home, temple or community. How many demanded that military force be used to protect the innocent and volunteered for our armed forces or other paramilitary units to go to where the persecution was taking place to kill the persecutors before they could murder more innocents? How many urged their sons, nephews, cousins and friends to join up and fight the perpetrators?

    hineni said:

    I hope that M.B. will share with us an account of what he (she?) has done about Darfur beyond this clarion call to action. As the comment reminds us, talk is cheap.

    Mark Tasch said:

    M.B. makes a couple of entirely valid points. As none of us can realistically be expected to offer up his own life or the life of a loved one to die in a purely altruistic war in which our own country is not threatened, we should be appropriately modest in our condemnation of those who were not willing to do so in the 1930s. In addition, although gestures such as fasting may enable us to feel compassionate and noble, we should be honest about their actual utility and value.

    As an aside, if one considers an opinion to be worth expressing, should one not consider that opinion worthy of his own real name? (And does anyone else see the humor in the use of "hineni" as a pseudonym?)

    Aryeh Lev said:

    Mark Tasch seems to find it kosher for M.B. to be anonymous, but treyf for hineni to be pseudonymous.

    But then, he also seems to find rhetoric kosher for himself and M.B. but treyf for Rabbi Saperstein.

    Mr. Tasch and M.B. are appropriately modest about their own accomplishments in the work of tikkun olam. And in comparison with Rabbi Saperstein, I'm sure they have much to be modest about.

    Mark Tasch said:

    On the contrary, my views of M.B.'s & of hineni's anonymity in expressing their opinions are the same. I only find "hineni" to be ironically amusing as a pseudonym. I am equally impressed by Mr. Lev's willingness to evaluate whatever I have done for other people without knowing me. Some useful and altruistic work is actually done without publicity.

    Post a comment