RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Galilee Diary: Peace talk VII: A modest proposal
    July 7, 2009
    Israel (17 comments)

    by Marc Rosenstein
    (Originally published in
    Galilee Diary and Ten Minutes of Torah)

    tmt-bug.jpg

    And they shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation shall not take up sward against nation; they shall never again know war; but every man shall sit under his grapevine or fig tree with no one to disturb him. -Micah 4:3-4

    I have tried over the years to avoid pontificating on large-scale national issues, but to keep this diary focused on the Galilee and my personal experiences there. However, sometimes it is hard to remain silent on the macro questions, and my experiences with Jewish-Arab relations here in the Galilee led me to the observations about "talking peace" in the last six entries. Which led me to the questionable step of wondering, "so, what is my vision, after all?" And even though I claim no authority in political science, international relations, etc., it seems a cop-out to keep speaking in generalizations and leaving the dirty work to others. So here is my peace proposal:

    1. Israel is the Jewish homeland and center of Jewish culture. Hebrew is the first language, Arabic second, English third - in public schools and in official government publications.
    2. Palestine is the Palestinian homeland and center of Palestinian culture. Arabic is the first language, Hebrew second, English third - in public schools and official government publications.
    3. Each state is a secular democracy, with full individual rights, equality of protection under law, and equality of opportunity for every citizen regardless of race, religion, ethnic origin, or gender.
    4. Jews are free to live in Palestine as Palestinian citizens - and Palestinians in Israel. Each minority will be guaranteed certain basic cultural rights such as the maintenance of their language community, religious institutions, unrestricted travel to their homeland.
    5. Religious communities are free to enforce, internally, their particular restrictions regarding membership, marriage eligibility, supplementary education, private education, and other matters, but, outside of basic restrictions on incest, all individuals may marry their chosen partner under law, with or without sanction of a particular religious community.
    6. Each state may develop an immigration policy in accordance with its needs and ideology.
    7. All parties renounce the use of force in solving disputes; a mechanism for mediation of disputes at various levels between the two states, and between their citizens, shall be established. Both states sides accept the borders (1949 lines) of this agreement and renounce any other territorial claims.
    8. A process of public reconciliation will be established, for creating a shared public historical record of events in the historic conflict between the two peoples.
    9. Both states pledge to cleanse their educational systems of materials demeaning to the other, and to institute (via a joint educational planning commission) a nationwide curriculum aimed at furthering reconciliation and partnership.
    10. While each state will be fully sovereign, certain commitments to cooperation will be institutionalized in this agreement:
      1. Movement/transportation/communication between the West Bank and Gaza
      2. A master plan for developing, preserving, and distributing the water resources of the whole region
      3. Access to, control of, safeguarding of holy places
      4. A master plan for environmental preservation
    11. Jerusalem will be one city with a formal mechanism for shared sovereignty. Each state will be granted, within the city, a capital zone wherein its key government institutions will be located.
    12. A joint commission, with international involvement, will develop a plan for resolution of the status of the Palestinian refugees by means of compensation and/or resettlement.
    13. The above definitions will be enshrined in a constitution for each state.  

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Larry Kaufman said:

    If it is reasonable to expect Irael, mipnei darchei shalom, for the sake of peace, to accept those parts of this "modest proposal" that can be implemented unilaterally -- how about pushing for them outside the framework of peace talks?

    Guaranteeing individual rights and equal protection, including freedom to marry, should be basic principles of Israeli law, nut just bargaining chips. Documenting its laws in a constitution is another proposal that does not need bilateral action.

    Let's have clean hands and pure hearts before we go mountain-climbing for peace, not make it conditional on someone else doing the same.

    Steve Kagan said:

    Typical idealistic liberal....grow up

    Cathy Shapiro said:

    The best thing about these proposals is that, in the end, they ask each sovereign nation to take responsibility for their own conduct. They don't say "Hey, wait just a minute, you go first!"

    To make peace a reality, each of these sovereign states must move forward from an extremely basic assumption. They must start again. Each of them needs to remember the following:

    WE MUST START OVER. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CLEAN HANDS. THERE WILL NEVER BE. WE HAVE MADE MANY MISTAKES, AND THERE IS SIMPLY NO WAY THAT WE CAN "FIX" SOME OF THEM.

    That is why a public reconciliation process, as Marc described, becomes so very important. This forum will give everyone a chance to tell their stories, so they are never forgotten. It makes learning from the past possible,so that we, Jews and Arabs, may start again.


    Margot B said:

    Halevai!

    William Berkson said:

    Are the 1949 borders really good, or realistic?

    Don't the intervening 60 years of war--initiated in 1948 by Arab powers who didn't accept the UN partition--mean that only negotiated borders will be respected by both sides?

    Norman Davis said:

    To use the uncouth vernacular: "It ain't never gonna happen" Too many super egos on both sides out there who will do their utmost best to thwart any efforts to live by these 13 rules. Plus lets not forget all the weapons manufactureres who won't make a buck and then need a federal bailout.

    Idealism is wonderful, but we must live in the real world with our eyes wide open. Use common sense and not cram stuff down someone's throat.

    I'm willing to help push these ideas if for no other reason than to get both sides to stop acting like spoiled brats in a playground sand box. The antics get pretty old and stale very quickly.

    Enough of my soapbox oratory. On to bigger and better things.

    Elinor Oertell said:

    The comments are very interesting and more than worthy of further discussion. I do have a problem with the section on marriage. Anyone holding Israeli citizenship must obey certain minimum standards of human rights. That includes not forcing children into arranged marriages.Marriage should be free choice for anyone no matter what his or her religion is. There must also be protection against so called "honor killings" and the beating of women and children or anyone for that matter.

    Sidney Margulies said:

    I would agree with your proposals with two exceptions.

    In a truly democratic stats, religion is a personal matter and does not become part of the political structure. The orthodox in both communities should have the right to live their lives in a manner consistent with their beliefs, but they should have no right to impose those beliefs and practices on others who choose to live their lives differently.

    The Palestinian state must be contiguous. It must be politically and eoonomically viable. I am not sure that what you wrote has that meaning.

    Raphael Jaffe said:

    Realistic and sensible. Should be brought to the attention of all the statesmen, politicians, and peace groups. Needs to be pushed!!

    Tirzah Mason said:

    Thanks for your excellent thinking, Mark. "It ain't never gonna happen" was said, of course, about the women's vote, civil rights, gay rights and the possiblity of a black President of the US. All reality must begin with an ideal toward which we work. IF we can't imagine it, we can't unleash the energy for it. So far, there has been a severe lack of imagination needed to create the world we want to live in. May we all continue to imagine...then work to make it so. I particularly like your statement about Jerusalem.
    Tirzah Mason, a grown up typical liberal idealist

    Harold V. Clumeck said:

    Re: Point #12 above. If Palestinian refugees are to be compensated (or something equivalent), then there needs to be compensation (or something equivalent) for the Jewish refugees who were ethnically cleansed from Arab countries.

    aschneider said:

    i can live with this proposal

    mary Harkavy said:

    I am impressed with your concepts. If only it all were possible. As it has been said before - "from your lips to Gods ears".

    Jon Green said:

    Yep, that'll work, just like it did between 1948 and 1967.

    How about this alternative?

    Israel is ours! Go away!

    Understand that if you give them an inch they will take not A mile but 100 miles. Proof of this. How many terrorists do they want back for ONE Israeli soldier?

    It has been suggested that we bomb these terrorists back to the stone age. My question is why only go half way? Send them back to Jordan instead!Or any other Middle eastern country that will have them. Have you noticed the lack of brotherhood these other countries extend to them? Yep, they don't want them either.

    Marian said:

    Even if there is no one on the Palestinian side to agree, I think it is worthwhile to put these proposals out there. After all, many of these require concessions on the Israeli side also.

    I am not hopeful, I admit. There is so much pain on each side.

    Joyce Rudnick said:

    Marc's credentials - paramount among them, he's an Israeli citizen (made aliyah from the US) and he has lived in the Galilee and worked with Israeli Arabs for many years - give him the 'right' to make this most thoughtful peace proposal. It deserves widespread study, not only by the Reform leadership here and in Israel, but by all who are genuinely concerned with finding a peaceful solution to the Israel-Palestine problem.

    Joyce Rudnick, The Community Synagogue, Port Washington, NY (where Marc served as assistant rabbi starting in July,1976, for two or three years)

    Curt Abbott said:

    To Steve Kagan:
    So what do you have to propose instead of name-calling? I didn't see an alternative proposal from you. Yes, much of this appears to be pipe-dream but much seems workable.

    Post a comment