RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Galilee Diary: Health care
    January 5, 2010
    Israel | Social Action (8 comments)

    by Marc Rosenstein
    (Originally published in
    Ten Minutes of Torah and Galilee Diary)

    And if you do obey these rules and observe them carefully, the Lord your God will maintain faithfully for you the covenant He made on oath with your fathers...The Lord will ward off from you all sickness; He will not bring upon you any of the dreadful diseases of Egypt, about which you know, but will inflict them upon all your enemies.
    -Deuteronomy 7:12, 15

    A recent trip to the regional specialty clinic in Haifa reminded me that for all the criticisms that it is possible to level at Israel for the gap between rich and poor, and for the inequalities in opportunities for different ethnic groups, one area in which we really have the right to be proud of our achievements is the health care system. First of all, it is important to point out that Israel has universal basic health care coverage. In return for a small monthly payroll deduction (waived for those who don't have a paycheck), every citizen can choose to enroll in one of several national HMOs. All normal, routine care and preventive care are covered, and there is a large "basket" of more expensive treatments, diagnostic tests, hospitalization, and medications that are included. Of course, the system is not infinite, and there is always controversy about what conditions or treatments are excluded from the "basket." Moreover, the limitations and inefficiencies that are probably inherent in any such system lead to class-based inequalities: those who can afford it buy supplemental insurance to cover what the system doesn't - and bypass the bureaucracy and waiting periods by paying for surgery privately. And at any given time there is a least one campaign being waged in the media to raise money for someone needing a hugely expensive treatment (e.g., organ transplant). The system clearly has its deficiencies. But it is a system that works. Everyone, regardless of religion or social class or ethnic group, can go to the doctor, can get a prescription for an expensive antibiotic, can have a CT scan, can see a top specialist - without stopping to wonder how to pay for it. Is the equality absolute? No, if you live in the periphery you'll have to spend time and money travelling to that regional specialty clinic; if you live in an unrecognized Bedouin village your local clinic may be limited in equipment (and in the hours it has electricity). If you are a foreign worker, you may be at the mercy of your labor contractor. We still have plenty to do; but it seems that the glass is way more than half full.

    But wait, there's more. Like anywhere in the world, rich and poor people live separately here. And Jews and Arabs attend separate schools, live in separate neighborhoods, speak different mother tongues. Hospitals and clinics, on the other hand, are a rather amazing model of integration, from the senior doctors to the cleaning crew - and of course including the patients. To visit a hospital is to encounter every stratum and sector of Israeli society working side by side, healing side by side, suffering side by side (i.e., bedside by bedside). All is not, of course, sweetness and light. I know that there are Jewish employees of Nahariyah hospital who resent the fact that an Arab doctor was appointed hospital director; I'm sure there are caregivers who complain about having to clean up after Ethiopians/Moroccans/Russians/Arabs/whatever. Israel is, after all, populated mostly by human beings. On the whole, however, I don't think it is an exaggeration to say that the health care system is essentially blind to race, religion, and national origins. While there are Israeli policies in the West Bank that have an "apartheid" feel about them, anyone who thinks this is an "apartheid state" should be taken to visit a hospital in the Galilee or the triangle or Jerusalem. Like every place in the world, we have our quota of racists and classists and sexists here. But unlike some places in the world, we seem to have internalized the belief that health care is simply a right due to every member of society equally, and I have never heard a voice arguing otherwise.

    So there's another reason to make aliyah, besides the cucumbers.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Jesse Rosenberg said:

    I greatly appreciate this persuasive essay on health care in Israel, but I have some difficulty in relating it to the passage from Deuteronomy about avoiding illness (and transferring illness to our "enemies") by following the rules of the covenant. This notion presents a number of thorny issues (theological, ethical, psychological, and medical) in need of thoughtful commentary and elucidation.

    Rabbi James Glazier said:

    Thank you for your article. However I don't appreciate the use of the term "apartheid" even for purposes of differentiating Israel from South Africa. It's a term used by Israel's enemies and has no place in RJ publications when referring to Israel. In Peace, Rabbi James S. Glazier

    sally sanders said:

    Hopefully, The United States will also have Universal Health Care. It will create a stronger and healthier nation.

    jr gordon said:

    The United States has universal health care today. Any citizen who wants healthcare can obtain it. Those who wish to prepay for their care, via insurance, may do so.

    Yes, the U.S. system needs reform to further improve access and affordability. For example, health insurance should not be tied to employment. This creates issues in portability, pre-existing conditions,and equitable pricing between the employer and individual marketplace.

    Marian said:

    Thanks for another glimpse into Israel, this time via the health-care window. More and more, I look at the American approach as a social "experiment", an experiment that other countries have handled in a different manner. It remains to be seen which experimental approach is correct. There are people who lose in each.

    I was born in an "apartheid" hospital, because America once had such a system of black hospitals and white hospitals. Considering that religious differences could have been construed as a barrier, it's good to learn that Israel avoided that much.

    Larry Kaufman said:

    America also had a system of Jewish hospitals, which were needed both to give Jewish doctors a place to practice, and to provide Jewish patients with kosher food. Mt. Sinai Hospital in Chicago was 100% kosher, even into an era when many of its patients were not Jewish. I asked the executive director once if they got complaints about the all-kosher policy. The answer was, Only from Jews.

    Today the Jews at Mt. Sinai are on its staff and board, not in its inpatient beds, and the hospital receives funding from the Jewish United Fund -- which helps cover the hundreds of thousands of dollars billed to patients who cannot pay. I presume that charity care is what jr gordon refers to in the absurd assertion that the United States has universal healthcare today.

    Kasi Pollock said:

    The American healthcare system is not perfect, nor is any other country's. Could it be improved? Absolutely! However, ceding our freedom in healthcare choices to our government is not the right answer. I worked in hospitals for many years and never saw anyone turned away because they didn't have insurance.
    As responsible citizens it is our obligation to hold our government more accountable while debating such a huge undertaking. Change this big passed so quickly and secretly (where is the promised C-span coverage and open debates?), that took huge bribes and coersion to win votes is worrisome, if not downright frightening. This is a lot of power and control that we are giving away to our government, under the guise of helping the disadvantaged, that would be almost impossible to take back if need be. In addition, it seems to me that by completely overhauling a good system, we will potentially lower the healthcare standard for the many in order to help a few. Can we not do something to raise the relatively few up to our current level?
    Nothing should be passed until TRUE honesty,transparency and thoughtful, open, bipartisan debate is shown. We must demand nothing less. I believe that insisting that our government leaders (on either side of the aisle)be held to a higher moral and ethical standard would go a long way in repairing our world and helping the less fortunate.

    Kasi said:

    Just one more comment! As I stated earlier, I worked as a nurse in a metropolitan hospital for many years and took care of some of the most privilged in society alongside some of the poorest, as well as immigrants- many of whom I'm sure did not arrive in the U.S. legally. Each was treated with the same respect and care due them as a human being. Was my treatment of them any different than those of my colleagues? No. Absolutely not. Our ultimate goal, no matter who they were, was to treat them to the best of our ability to restore their health, and if that could not be done, to make their last days with us as comfortable as possible. People may say that we have a long way to go before we reach true equality, but I believe that often we don't give ourselves enough credit as to how far we have come.

    Post a comment