RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    We Dare Not Be Silent
    February 23, 2010
    By Rabbi Eric Yoffie | Israel (14 comments)

    by Rabbi Eric Yoffie
    (Originally published in Reform Judaism magazine)

    When the history of Reform Judaism is written a century from now, its authors will ask many questions: Did Reform Jews study Torah, perform mitzvot, bring justice to the world? But most important of all: Did we do enough to safeguard the security and well-being of the State of Israel?

    I am worried now, not because we don't love Israel, but because we are distracted. As we learned in the aftermath of the stock market crash of 1929, during tough economic times North American Jews turn inward, focusing on personal problems and not the problems of the Jewish people. Though understandable, this is a huge mistake at a time when the government of Iran, supported by Russia and China, is inching toward the nuclear threshold--and the potential to deliver on its off-repeated promise to destroy the Jewish state. Not since the Yom Kippur War has Israel's survival been more precarious.

    What Israel needs from us now is unconditional support. It needs our visits, our dollars, and our engagement. And it needs our political activism. We must call upon the U.S. and Canadian governments, both devoted friends of Israel, to impose the toughest possible economic sanctions on Iran--with others if possible, unilaterally if necessary--if it refuses to abandon its nuclear ambitions. Iran will stop its nuclear program only if it feels real pain, and what has been done up to now is not sufficient.

    Israel needs our help in other ways, too, and this means hearing our criticisms. Unconditional support is not the same as uncritical support. We love the Jewish state, but we must hold firm to our vision of a Jewish, democratic, and pluralistic Israel. We cannot accept settlement in the heart of the West Bank, where a Palestinian state must one day arise. We cannot accept the relegation of Orthodox women to the back section of buses in Jerusalem. And we cannot accept the denial of Reform Jewish rights by Israeli lawmakers. We will always reach for the highest ideals of the Zionist dream, seeking justice for all of Israel's citizens and for her neighbors as well.

    At this critical juncture, however, let us not forget, even for a moment, that all will be lost if Tehran has its way. Time is running out. God and history will not excuse us if we are silent.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Donald Pomeranz said:

    While I recognize your intent and feel 100% the same way it is ironic that reports in the press, i.e. Newsweek, report a growing self-confidence, or complacency on the part of Israelis themselves regarding Iran and any kind of threat to their security.
    Israel has become so efficient at protecting itself that she feels she can do it alone and the world be damned. And this now I think sadly includes the United States.
    About the only thing I felt totally positive about with our former administration was it's unfailing unequiviocal support for the State of Israel. I do not have that confidence with this administration. I think the Israelis feel the same way thus their self confidence and self reliance on their own initiatives, economic power and self preservation.

    Michael Singer said:

    Great peice!! I wish the Reform movement would follow its own advice.
    Rabbi Yosie implores us not to be distracted and concentrate on Israel. This is something all Jews have in common. We must work together for Israel, for surely the rest of the world will not.
    In the same issue of this newspetter, You get distracted with health care and based on a political opinion that not all Jewish people share. I wish URJ would focus on what we have in common and what we NEED to have in common.
    MS

    Jeff Rosenberg said:

    Israel's ungracious swipe at the US and VP Biden in recent days calls into question Rabbi Yoffie's suggestion that Israel needs only a gentle nudge from time to time to ease the plight of women and the Reform citizens of the nation. It's a lot more than that. The continued growth of Jewish settlements in Arab neighborhoods is endangering the Arab-Israeli peace process and by extension contributing to instability and strife throughout the region. Our own country's security is directly threatened by escalation of tensions in the region. Certainly American officials know this and will have to start handling relations with Israel in a different fashion. Could Rabbi Yoffie forsee a set of circumstances when American Jews would ever stand up and loudly proclaim that the Israeli government's policies are reckless and dangerous? It begins to look like both American Jews and even the American government are being ignored by Israel's leaders.

    Barry Rapoport said:

    To be fair, all countries should not be allowed to develop, maintain or expand nuclear arms capacity. Justice, Fairness, Equality. By suggesting that one country can and another can't is inherently unfair.
    The best way to secure a safe and secure Israel is to work toward the dismantling of nuclear arms in countries that possess them while working toward stopping those countries that are developing them. To remain on a path of mutual annihilation is more than disagreeable! To say that it's OK for us and them, but not for you will increase the speed and the perceived need for increasing power through catastrophic weaponry.
    Barry Rapoport

    Oscar D said:

    The West's penchance for showing tolerance toward the intolerant will lead to the destruction of western civilization. Militant Islam is on the rise. Our desire to look away and accept dhimmi status will only accelerate the destruction of western civilization and the values of personal freedom, individual rights and tolerance toward others that we hold most dear.

    Dawn Krouse said:

    My family was discussing this very issue last night. If the Jews of America, in particular those of the Reform Movement, do not make Israel's security and existence our number one concern and priority then we can kiss not only Israel but possibly ourselves goodbye.

    The goal of the Palestinians is the destruction of the State of Israel,its citizens and all Jews; we all know it. Anyone who says it is not is in denial. The Obama administrations treatment of one of our greatest ally's is an embarrassment to the US. But it is obvious from the time they came into office that they have no regard for Israel. So no Mr. Rosenburg it is not Israel who embarrassed the US. Obama and company support the very countries and people who seek to destroy Israel. Just in case anyone has forgotten Israel is a democracy, as is the US. It is a sovereign country with every right to protect itself. I am tired of US politicians and citizens thinking we can tell Israel what to do and what to give away. Why don't we just hand over New York to the Islamic Fascist who want to kill us.

    What I cannot understand for the life of me is why the US Jewish Reform Movement has its head buried in the sand. History does not always repeat itself but many times it does. With the few numbers of Jews left in this world, the rising tide of anti-Semitism, and the world's view of the Palestinians as "victims" and not the perpetrators - soon there may be no Jews left and no trace of our heritage.

    John Feibel said:

    My letter to the Editor regarding your laudable realization that Israel's security & well-being is even more important than "bringing justice to the world "may not be published so I want to communicate directly with you. Your organization, URJ through its subsidiary, RAC, is,ironically, one of the reasons that Reform Jews have neglected Israel. RAC which, as you know, is an ultra-liberal Political (not Religious) Action Committee, organized the Aug 18, 2009 Obama conference call which led to myself & perhaps a million of my fellow congregants hearing the call for health care reform, a secular, political issue, instead of hearing about the tragic state of affairs now facing Jews, Jewish interests & Israel, during the High Holidays. Finally, you seem to realize the misplaced priorities of your own organization. From now on we should expect to hear from our pulpits more about Jewish problems (declining numbers, increasing anti-Jewish hostility, anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism etc) & less about "social justice" & political issues which are better addressed in other venues than from the pulpit of our religious institutions. More Jews are realizing that unqualified support of liberal policies is not helping Israel (Obama is far less supportive of Israel than any recent president back to Carter). Just look at today's anti-Israel diatribe orchestrated by him. RAC should be less partisan ( 50% of Americans calling themselves liberal supported Israel in its wars against Hezbollah & Hamas while 75% of Americans calling themselves conservative supported Israel).
    As Pogo said, "we have met the enemy & they are us". John Feibel, Cincinnati, Ohio

    Don Levey said:

    I must take issue with two small points in Rabbi Yoffie's recent editorial. I am distressed to see our core values abandoned in favor of an externally-developed sense of political correctness that will, in the end, work against Reform Jews and our interests.

    Rabbi Yoffie believes that we as Reform Jews should protest against the Mehadrin buses that run on some routes in Jerusalem. That is, sadly, hypocritical - especially when he follows it up with a demand that our own rights as Reform Jews be respected. If we fight for freedom, we must fight for everyone. Denying Orthodox Jews the right to practice as they see fit undermines our own legitimacy because it gives them license to do the same to us. On the contrary, we must wholeheartedly support the small number of buses which cater to the crowd that does want it.

    Likewise, Rabbi Yoffie comes out against settlements that are indeed in our best interests. To oppose them is to prove Meir Kahane right - that Jews and Muslims cannot live together in peace. We cannot take the stand that Israel must remain multi-cultural and yet require that any future Palestinian state be Judenrein . If we are "seeking justice for all of Israel’s citizens and for her neighbors as well" that must include the right of Jews to live in peace in a Palestinian state. As Reform Jews, this should be an even higher priority than the political realities that make settlements a necessity, even if only for the short term.

    That some within the URJ want to treat the Reform Movement as a political action committee of completely like-minded individuals is unfortunate; that we are doing so according to an agenda which seems to be set by external values is quite discomfiting. I find myself saying with increasing frequency "this organization doesn't speak for me, or for all Reform Jews" when confronted with such statements. I would hope that someday we can return to our *own* values with some degree of consistency.

    M. B. said:

    Don, the segregated buses which run on over 100 bus lines in Israel are public buses, not private ones. If ultra-Orthodox Jews insist on putting their women in the back of their own buses or pick-up trucks while the men ride up front, that is different from segregating the public transportation. People who are not ultra-Orthodox have must have a choice on where to sit on public transportation. Remember, the ultra-Orthodox are not content to having segregated buses, they also want segregated public street, segregated stores and offices, etc. And they have segregated schools, which not only exclude women, but also black Jews, and people from different religions. An entire Jim Crow society. When people insist on segregation in the name of Judaism, I believe progressive Jews have an obligation to stand up and convince them that segregation is not a Jewish value any more than degrading the status of women. Even they refuse to listen to reason, we have an ethical obligation to fight segregation and practices which demean women.

    As for integrated neighborhoods, I am all for that in Israel just as we have in the U.S. Also in the occupied territories and everywhere else in the world. There were integrated neighborhoods in the Middle East long before the state of Israel was founded. The settlements in the occupied territories are not integrated. The settlers are not sending their children to schools with their non-settler neighbors. They are not socializing with their non-settler neighbors. These settlements are about seizing and holding territory, not creating a pluralistic society.

    Don Levey said:

    Ah, it sounds like tolerance must have limits, then. We must insist on tolerance of our activities, practices, and beliefs even when they believe that we are trampling all over Judaism, but tolerance doesn't extent to those we believe are trampling over what is right, because we are right and by definition they must be wrong. Do you not understand that they believe they have just as much ethical obligation to fight *us*? Israel isn't the US, and trying to make it into the US (complete with 1st amendment protections) will turn it instead into an Islamic republic. So long Jewish state.

    The towns in Yesha, by the way, aren't integrated because the *Palestinians* (also) don't want it that way. Hebron, for example, is mostly Arab, having only a few Jewish residents. But why are we talking about integrated neighborhoods rather than regions? Must we continue the ethnic cleansing to satisfy a peace process that has no adherents on one side? At the most pragmatic, we give up yet another bargaining chip while they are still officially sworn to destroy us.

    M. B. said:

    The Bible makes it clear that a Jewish state gets no free pass. Rather it is held to a high ethical standard, which many times Jewish states have failed to meet, angering God and leading to misery and destruction.

    Our ancestors were confident that Jews would run an exemplary state if given the chance again in modern times. After all, Jews were so often the victims of discrimination and oppression, denied important rights. Surely no one would be more sensitive to protecting the rights of Jews and Gentiles alike than Jews.

    We would not be true friends of Israel if we did not use our influence to see that all the rights we enjoy as Americans were protected for all people in their country. That certainly includes the rights protected by our Bill of Rights including the free exercise of religion, prevention of establishment of religion by the state, freedom of speech, freedom to peacefully assemble, freedom to petition the government, the guaranty that life, liberty or property would not be taken without due process of law, protection against unreasonable search and seizure, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment. These rights are not some frills which weaken a country; history has proven that they strengthen it. Additionally, unless the people in Israel share the rights which Americans prize so highly, how can the foreign supporters of Israel defend it and win friends for it?

    Victor Williams said:

    Establishment of religion is the raison de etre of the modern state of Israel. To attempt to reverse that is to destroy it twice: once by removing the very nature of the nation, and a second time when the Islamists (as they have publicly stated) move in in force and *Democratically* change Israel into another Islamic theocracy. This reminds me of Solomon and the baby: if we can't have our own way, then no Jew should?

    M. B. said:

    Israel was not created to be an ultra-Orthodox country. It was to be a haven for persecuted Jews, where they could enter at will and live in freedom until such time as they chose to move elsewhere. Those goals can be easily achieved without establishing a state religion.

    No modern state has any business dictating religious practices. Establishing a certain religion, like ultra-Orthodox Judaism or even Reform Judaism, corrupts religion as well as corrupting the government. It is always a bad thing and our founding fathers wisely recognized that.

    Aryeh Lev said:

    That Israel could serve as a haven for persecuted Jews was not the reason for its creation, only a byproduct. As articulated in the Balfour Declaration, it was to be a national home for the Jewish people. Although its citizens have the freedom to move elsewhere, its mission was and is not to be a way station, and I can't begin to imagine where M.B. might have gotten such an idea.

    M.B. further implies that ultra-Orthodox Judaism and Reform Judaism are two different religions, when in fact they are two different expressions of the same religion, and that religion,along with its cultural and ethnic expressions, is central, as Mr. Williams posits, to the identity of the nation. If the Jewish nature of Israel is not at its core, then what is our connection to it as American Reform Jews?

    Rabbi Yoffie said it very well: we must hold firm to our vision of a Jewish, democratic, and pluralistic Israel, an Israel that can indeed serve as a light to the nations. It takes nothing away either from Israel or from the United States to not expect it to be a U.S. clone.

    Post a comment