RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    Galilee Diary: Definitions VI
    April 20, 2010
    Israel (7 comments)

    by Marc Rosenstein
    (Originally published in
    Ten Minutes of Torah and Galilee Diary)

    Rabbi Abba said in the name of Samuel: for three years the School of Shammai and the School of Hillel were in disagreement, each insisting that the halachah was according to its view.  A heavenly voice was heard, saying "Both views are the words of the living God, and the halachah is according to the School of Hillel."  But if both are the words of the living God, why did the School of Hillel merit that the halachah followed its view?  Because they were soft-spoken and humble, and taught both their view and the view of the School of Shammai - and even mentioned the opinion of the School of Shammai first.
    -Babylonian Talmud, Eruvin 13b

    A couple of months ago I began a series of entries trying to explain the fine points of difference among the religious "streams" in Israel.  Before moving on, herewith a scorecard, to help keep track of the players (in rough order of numbers):

    1.  Cultural, non-religious Zionism: The "mainstream" of Israeli culture that has dominated the education system and public life for a century.  Sees Judaism as a national culture (like Frenchness for French people, or Polishness for Poles), in which the symbols of the Jewish tradition are secular, cultural symbols, no longer necessarily connected to religious belief.  The prime exponent of this approach, Achad Ha'am, was a strong influence on Mordecai Kaplan, founder of Reconstructionism in North America.

    2.  Traditionalist Zionism: The approach that characterized the waves of immigration from North Africa and the Middle East; a cultural definition that keeps within it many customs and behaviors rooted in Orthodox norms: e.g., my friend who doesn't normally attend synagogue or consider himself "religious," but when visiting the states with a group on Yom Kippur walked miles (to a Reform synagogue) rather than drive on the holiday.

    3.  Orthodox Zionism: The Jewish state is the "first flowering of our redemption" - its existence has religious significance and thus must be supported and respected, and characterized by a lifestyle and culture in consonance with halachah.

    4.  Orthodox non-Zionism: The Jewish state is just another secular state that happens to be located in our holy land.  It is not the beginning of the redemption - it has no religious meaning.  We must live our lives here as we did and would in any Orthodox community elsewhere.

    5.  Messianic Orthodox Zionism: The dawning of the redemption we have seen in the past century requires us to be proactive in bringing about the conditions for its fulfillment, e.g., the conquest of all of the biblically-defined land of Israel.

    6.  Anti-religious Zionism: Judaism the religion was a temporary measure associated with exile; now that we have returned to a normal, national existence, it has become obsolete and counterproductive.

    7.  Liberal religious Zionism:  The synthesis between a Judaism based on a rational understanding of human autonomy and historical development - and an enlightened modern state in Israel - can advance the cause of redemption.

    8.  Orthodox anti-Zionism: God has not given us any sign that redemption is near, and thus we are forbidden to try to create a Jewish state.  This faction refuses to pay taxes or vote or receive state medical benefits etc.

    9.  Universalistic anti-Zionism: Ethnic nation-states and nationalism in general are factors that generate conflict and hatred, and Judaism should have no part in them.  Hence, a Jewish state is a passé if not reactionary concept.

    #1 and #2 above are sort of the general baseline, the background noise, of Israeli life.  All of the others may be found in specific movements, political parties, and/or communities.  Lots of voices - but all of them, whether we like it or not, have something of value to say.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    Hineni said:

    I'd be curious to hear where you see the something of value in #8. This is not to say that the body politic shouldn't hear these voices, or deal with the problems they create -- just questioning the suggestion that there is any merit to the position.

    Debbie Weissman said:

    In today's column, "Definitions VI," I wish add that certain kinds of syntheses are possible among these different streams. They are not all mutually exclusive. For example, I would say that some of us integrate insights from 1, 3 and 7.
    The big news within Orthodox Zionism is that there is more and more of a social-ideological-and-primarily cultural-educational split between two streams--the so-called modern Orthodox and the Hardalim. (a blend of some ultra-Orthodox attitudes with a kind of ultra-nationalism.) The split ranges from the role of women to attitudes towards democracy, the courts, the Army, etc.
    As far as what we can gain from the anti-Zionist Orthodox-possibly, a skepticism and even kind of humility reagrding the whole project? Debbie Weissman, Jerusalem

    David Mollen said:

    Do you know why the Harvard crew team always beats the Yeshiva crew team? Because on the Harvard crew team, they have one guy yelling and eight guys rowing.

    Derek said:

    Yes, and what about #5? What of value did Baruch Goldstein, Meir Kahane, and their ilk have to say? It seems that if you take the "every view is valid approach," you have to start taking seriously the ideas of some real haters.

    Laura said:

    It's interesting to note that Reform and Conservative Judaism doesn't seem to play a role in the different "streams" you've noted. I am often struck that the religious viewpoint of most American Jews is not even acknowledged in Israel (since it is clear that the government's tie to religion is reflected through the lens of Orthodox Judaism). As an observant Reform Jew, would I be considered to be in the same category as a "cultural, non-religious zionist"? I don't consider myself a secular Jew, although as a Reform Jew I live my life within the American community at large. Does Israel not have a significant population which identifies itself as Reform or Conservative?

    Linda VanHorne said:

    Hello Rabbi Rosenstein,

    I am an American Jew who will probably never have the joy of seeing Israel and yet I am a fervent Zionist. I would love to see you do the same sort of "stream" analogy of American Jewry and our complicated relationship with Israel. My personal opinion is that we Jews are asking for an extremely tiny piece of land as a haven from Anti-Semitism. We have made disproportionate contributions to all humanity and have been disproportionately slaughtered compared to other peoples and religions. The other peoples and countries should allow us; no, joyfully grant us a protected and safe homeland.

    Norm said:

    They may all have SOMETHING of value to say. But that does not mean they are all "valid".

    You have left out the many of us who are more-or-less religious and/or observant, who do NOT see the State as any part of a messianic redemption, but still support it as a Jewish state in the Land of Israel. (After all, we have no more reason to see it a the dawning of our redemption that the Hasmonean Kingdom.)

    Post a comment