RJ.org News and Views of Reform Jews
 
About | Submissions | Contact
topics

  • Torah
  • Defining Reform
  • Jewish History
  • Jewish Living
  • Community
  • Social Action
  • Israel/World
  • Holidays
  • Shabbat
  • Lifecycle
  • Youth & Family
  • College Life
  • Books
  • Ask The Rabbi

    Get Jewish World News in your inbox

    BOOKS & MUSIC

    Inside Intermarriage
    Inside Intermarriage:
    A Christian Partner's Perspective on Raising a Jewish Family

    by Jim Keen
    (URJ Press)

    The Torah
    The Torah: A Women's Commentary
    (URJ Press)

    Union for Reform Judaism

    New Bill Would be "Disastrous to the Unity of the Jewish People"
    April 30, 2010
    Conversion | Israel (2 comments)

    by Kate Bigam
    Press Secretary, Religious Action Center
    Originally posted on the
    RACblog

    Israeli Knesset Member David Rotem, who has proposed a piece of legislation dealing with conversion in Israel, met earlier this week with leaders of the North American Jewish community to discuss the bill's possible ramifications. Following a series of discussions with Rotem in new York City, the Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist movements together issued a joint statement expressing our disapproval of the bill and our concern about its potential ramifications.

    The statement is after the jump. Read more about this bill in this story or this one, both from JTA, and in this op-ed by Rabbi Uri Regev, president of Hiddush, a group that advocates for religious freedom in Israel.

    We are appreciative of the substantial amount of time MK David Rotem devoted to meetings with us, individually and collectively, during his visit to the United States to discuss the legislation he has sponsored in the Knesset dealing with conversion and the Law of Return. We also welcome Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Daniel Ayalon's participation in many of our meetings.

    It should, first, be emphasized that we deeply appreciate Mr. Rotem's stated goal in advancing the legislation - to ameliorate the bottleneck in the conversion process that currently keeps as many as 350,000 thousand olim (immigrants) from the former Soviet Union from converting to Judaism. The laudable goal of attempting to hasten the process of conversion for these individuals - who currently serve in the Israeli army and contribute positively to Israeli society - is one that deserves widespread attention and support. Together, we thank MK Rotem for his efforts in addressing this crisis.

    MK Rotem believes his proposed legislation would rapidly open the door to a faster conversion process. We respectfully disagree. Not only would this legislation fail to achieve his forecasted result, the collateral damage to the 85% of world Jewry who are not Orthodox (and perhaps others who are) would be disastrous to the unity of the Jewish people in a number of ways.

    The bill threatens to alter the Law of Return and consolidate conversion power into the hands of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel. Both of these results could have devastating effects on the relationship between Israeli and Diaspora Jewry and thus on the broader unity of the Jewish people. Such concentration of power in favor of Ultra-Orthodox Jewry effectively negates the roles of the non-Orthodox movements both within Israel and abroad, sending the message that only the Orthodox have a place within our Homeland.

    Specifically, the current formulations of Article 1 would legislate the role and status of the Chief Rabbinate in a way not previously written into law. Such legislation would turn back the clock on 20 years of hard-won accomplishments in the Israeli High Court and complicate future efforts to appeal to the Court, which has been the single mechanism to counter religious discrimination in Israel.

    This bill returns us to the destructive "who is a Jew" question, that has previously threatened to divide World Jewry, as it does today. To explicitly connect conversion to a single religious stream, while making no mention of other streams of Judaism, is by definition to compromise and jeopardize the Law of Return, as it places the decision for "who is a Jew" in the hands of one group. Such an action is inconsistent with the democratic ideals on which the State of Israel was founded and relies, and would detrimentally affect the worldwide Jewish community.

    Further compounding our concern is the fact that the bill mentions no alternative method of conversion via non-Orthodox streams. We - and more importantly, our Israeli colleagues and their lawyers - believe that this language, if adopted as written, would further marginalize and hamper the Masorti and Reform movements in Israel. This would be a tragic consequence as we offer vibrant religious alternatives to a nation of Jews religiously alienated by the increasingly extreme positions of a minority religious establishment. We firmly believe that any conversion legislation must explicitly address these concerns.

    We are additionally troubled by language that provides that any person who entered Israel while ineligible to receive Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return will remain ineligible following conversion. Though MK Rotem says this language exists to outlaw the possibility of illegal immigrants undergoing conversion solely to obtain Israeli citizenship and remain in the country, the reality is that this deeply troubling clause differentiates between those who are born Jewish and those who choose to be Jewish, amending the Law of Return to exclude those who have made a conscious decision to join the Jewish community. For 2,000 years, Judaism has treated Jews-by-choice the same as Jews-by-birth. We are taught "as soon as a convert emerges from the mikvah (ritual bath) she or he is Jewish for all purposes." (Talmud, Yevamot 47b) We see no justification now for differentiating between groups of Jews or including an article with such severe ramifications in the framework of a law purportedly dealing with easing conversion procedures.

    While we recognize the goals Mr. Rotem is working to achieve and deeply respect his efforts, we cannot lend our support to a bill that will have such devastating ramifications. This moment, when Israel faces a great many challenges, both at home and abroad, is no time to enact legislation that has the potential to divide the Jewish community or to alienate Diaspora Jewry.

    Even as we expressed our concerns to Deputy Foreign Minister Ayalon and MK Rotem, we also emphasized our steadfast love and commitment to the people and State of Israel. It is in this spirit of unity that we stand shoulder to shoulder with our colleagues in the Masorti and Reform movements in Israel and with one another. Indeed, it is our unconditional love for Israel as both a sovereign nation and a worldwide Jewish community that calls us to urge, in the strongest possible terms, upon MK Rotem, the Yisrael Beitenu party, and Prime Minister Netanyahu to withdraw this bill and introduce legislation that resolves the urgent problems of olim from the former Soviet Union without compromising either the core democratic values of the State or the Law of Return.

    print Print     email Email     comment Comment    

     

    Comments

    C.B. said:

    Let me see if I understand this correctly The Orthodox, who live off the dole and don't do military service, are able to exclude from citizenship Soviet Jews who do serve in the Army and put their lives on the line so that the Orthodox can have a country to decide such issues for. No thanks. Give my my American democracy (with its separation of church and state) any day of the week. Of course, I hope these Orthodox understand that they certainly don't want American Jews of questionable provenance lobbying the American gov't to support Israel. Haredim aren't hypocrites, are they?

    Dr. Larry H Bernstein said:

    I am a jew and a Kohen living in the US, but I am a reform jew by choice, and I was brought up in the conservative practice of Hallachic judaism, while my grandfather was a Litvak from the Carpathian Mountains. I laid tefillin when my father and my mother died for a year. I duchened with my grandfather at age 13. Does this define my tie to judaism? My ties to Eastern european jewish history and family tradition are inextricably linked to my worldview.

    I have had a first aliya at the reading of the Torah in a jewish sanctuary in Brooklyn. The principles of the US constitution were laid down by Protestants who read their version of the old testament and thought it the foundation for a stable society.

    I agree with the observation of the respected and wise leader Shimon Perez:
    A split in the Jewish life will be catastrophic and totally unnecessary.

    We bear the responsibility for generations to come. We should handle it with care while preserving unity.

    As a North American Jew, I request stopping passage of the David Rotem “conversion legislation”.

    I think the bill’s intent to grant the Chief Rabbinate sole control over conversion in Israel is the equivalent of returning to a situation in which the Great Rabbi Gamliel, descendent of Hillel the Elder, had an autocratic jurisdiction over jewish society in a different time.

    The proposed legislation is an obvious attack on the legitimacy of non-Orthodox Jewry, which as you know comprises the vast majority of world Jewry, and to what end. I referred to Maimonides only because he was brilliant and a philosopher of the ages, who along with Baruch Spinoza, whether their thinking held sway or not, was respected and deeply thought out for all time. I recall that Moses name changed to Yisrael after he fought with the messenger of G-d. I was tought to think above all, and I studied under the great Yale pathologist (a jew from Germany) Averill A. Liebow, who went to Hiroshima at the end of WWII.

    Hatred has been the greatest nightmare of human history, and it remains so. It doesn't arise from racial issues, but has always been about class and control. This has been a burden to the jews, who struggled with it with success and despair.

    Should the Rotem Bill be enacted, it will exacerbate a division between the largest world Jewish communities not only when close relations are essential, but also when we know that such a breech is a part of the story of the destruction of both Temples.

    Sincerely,

    Larry H. Bernstein, MD

    Post a comment